The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TOUGH2 User's Guide Version 2
Open accessAbstract
TOUGH2 is a numerical simulator for nonisothermal flows of multicomponent, multiphase fluids in one, two, and three-dimensional porous and fractured media. The chief applications for which TOUGH2 is designed are in geothermal reservoir engineering, nuclear waste disposal, environmental assessment and remediation, and unsaturated and saturated zone hydrology. TOUGH2 was first released to the public in 1991; the 1991 code was updated in 1994 when a set of preconditioned conjugate gradient solvers was added to allow a more efficient solution of large problems. The current Version 2.0 features several new fluid property modules and offers enhanced process modeling capabilities, such as coupled reservoir-wellbore flow, precipitation and dissolution effects, and multiphase diffusion. Numerous improvements in previously released modules have been made and new user features have been added, such as enhanced linear equation solvers, and writing of graphics files. The T2VOC module for three-phase flows of water, air and a volatile organic chemical (VOC), and the T2DM module for hydrodynamic dispersion in 2-D flow systems have been integrated into the overall structure of the code and are included in the Version 2.0 package. Data inputs are upwardly compatible with the previous version. Coding changes were generally kept to a minimum, and were only made as needed to achieve the additional functionalities desired. TOUGH2 is written in standard FORTRAN77 and can be run on any platform, such as workstations, PCs, Macintosh, mainframe and supercomputers, for which appropriate FORTRAN compilers are available. This report is a self-contained guide to application of TOUGH2 to subsurface flow problems. It gives a technical description of the TOUGH2 code, including a discussion of the physical processes modeled, and the mathematical and numerical methods used. Illustrative sample problems are presented along with detailed instructions for preparing input data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A method for quick assessment of CO2 storage capacity in closed and semi-closed saline formations
Zhou, Q., Birkholzer, J. T., Tsang, C.-F., & Rutqvist, J. (2008) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.02.004 · Cited by 455
Modelling soil carbon and nitrogen cycles during land use change. A review
Batlle-Aguilar, J., Brovelli, A., Porporato, A., & Barry, D. A. (2011) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1051/agro/2010007 · Cited by 101
Ion Diffusion Within Water Films in Unsaturated Porous Media
Tokunaga, T. K., Finsterle, S., Kim, Y., Wan, J., Lanzirotti, A., & Newville, M. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05891 · Cited by 46
Maggi, F., & Pallud, C. (2010) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2010.07.012 · Cited by 37
Characterizing the Geothermal Lithium Resource at the Salton Sea
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), B., Dobson, P., USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), R. P. O. G. T. O., Araya, N., Brounce, M., Busse, M., Camarillo, M., English, L., Humphreys, J., Kalderon-Asael, B., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2172/2222403 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Pruess, K., Oldenburg, C. M., & Moridis, G. J.
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- OpenAlex
- W2139247256
- Cited by
- 1,717
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TOUGH2 User's Guide Version 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2172/751729
- The paper
- Pruess, K., Oldenburg, C. M., & Moridis, G. J. (1999). TOUGH2 User's Guide Version 2. https://doi.org/10.2172/751729
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.