The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Code Verification by the Method of Manufactured Solutions
Open accessAbstract
A procedure for code Verification by the Method of Manufactured Solutions (MMS) is presented. Although the procedure requires a certain amount of creativity and skill, we show that MMS can be applied to a variety of engineering codes which numerically solve partial differential equations. This is illustrated by detailed examples from computational fluid dynamics. The strength of the MMS procedure is that it can identify any coding mistake that affects the order-of-accuracy of the numerical method. A set of examples which use a blind-test protocol demonstrates the kinds of coding mistakes that can (and cannot) be exposed via the MMS code Verification procedure. The principle advantage of the MMS procedure over traditional methods of code Verification is that code capabilities are tested in full generality. The procedure thus results in a high degree of confidence that all coding mistakes which prevent the equations from being solved correctly have been identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Concepts of Model Verification and Validation
B.H.Thacker, S.W.Doebling, F.M.Hemez, Anderson, M. C., Pepin, J. E., & Rodriguez, E. A. (2004) · doi:10.2172/835920 · Cited by 272
Credibility of In Silico Trial Technologies—A Theoretical Framing
Viceconti, M., Juarez, M. A., Curreli, C., Pennisi, M., Russo, G., & Pappalardo, F. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2019.2949888 · Cited by 67
Hariharan, P., D’Souza, G. A., Horner, M., Morrison, T. M., Malinauskas, R. A., & Myers, M. R. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178749 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- SALARI, K., & KNUPP, P.
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W1519745724
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Code Verification by the Method of Manufactured Solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2172/759450
- The paper
- SALARI, K., & KNUPP, P. (2000). Code Verification by the Method of Manufactured Solutions. https://doi.org/10.2172/759450
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.