The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of Offshore Wind Energy Resources for the United States
Open accessAbstract
This report summarizes the offshore wind resource potential for the contiguous United States and Hawaii as of May 2009. The development of this assessment has evolved over multiple stages as new regional meso-scale assessments became available, new validation data was obtained, and better modeling capabilities were implemented. It is expected that further updates to the current assessment will be made in future reports.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Large-Scale Offshore Wind Power in the United States: Assessment of Opportunities and Barriers
Musial, W., & Ram, B. (2010) · doi:10.2172/990101 · Cited by 276
Self-citationStructural control and vibration issues in wind turbines: A review
Xie, F., & Aly, A.-M. (2020) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110087 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, M., Heimiller, D., Haymes, S., & Musial, W.
- Published
- 2010-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W116056768
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Offshore Wind Energy Resources for the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2172/983415
- The paper
- Schwartz, M., Heimiller, D., Haymes, S., & Musial, W. (2010). Assessment of Offshore Wind Energy Resources for the United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/983415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
