Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chromatographic Retention Parameters in Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology

Nasal, Antoni, Siluk, Danuta, Kaliszan, Roman·2003·Current Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

The importance of lipophilicity for pharmacological and toxicological potency of xenobiotics has been recognized for a century. The reference lipophilicity scale is defined by the logarithm of partition coefficient, log P, determined in the l-octanol-water partition system. The tediousness of determinations and limited interlaboratory reproducibility of log P, on one hand, and the observations of linear relationship between log P and chromatographic retention parameters, on the other hand, gave rise to the substitution of the former by the readily available chromatographic data. Since its introduction, the reversed-phase high - performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), which has been viewed in terms of partition of a solute between a polar, aqueous mobile phase and a nonpolar stationary phase appeared especially suitable for lipophilicity (hydrophobicity) determination. The method got wide acceptance and has officially been recommended by the OECD. Fundamental relationships between chromatographic parameters are reviewed from the point of view of convenient and reliable lipophilicity measurements. The advantages and disadvantages of the stationary phase materials, which are presently employed for the determination of lipophilicity as well as those of specific HPLC systems and procedures, are critically reported. The literature on the application of chromatographic and electrochromatographic methods for assessment of lipophilicity of xenobiotics is reviewed. A separate paragraph is devoted to interpretation of retention parameters from HPLC systems comprising biomacromolecules. Role of lipophilicity in drug-biomacromolecule interactions is discussed in terms of quantitative structure-retention relationships (QSRR). Finally, reports are analyzed on systemic information which can be extracted by multivariate methods of data processing, like principal component analysis (PCA), from sets of lipophilicity parameters determined in diverse HPLC systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/0929867033368268

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Nasal, A., Siluk, D., & Kaliszan, R.
Venue
Current Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
381-426
ISSN
0929-8673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168149674
Cited by
167
References
0
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromatographic Retention Parameters in Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/0929867033368268
The paper
Nasal, A., Siluk, D., & Kaliszan, R. (2003). Chromatographic Retention Parameters in Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology. Current Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867033368268

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.