Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Natural Products in the Process of Finding New Drug Candidates

Vuorela, P., Leinonen, M., Saikku, P., Tammela, P., Rauha, J.-, Wennberg, T., Vuorela, H.·2004·Current Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

Natural derived or originated compounds still play a major role as drugs, and as lead structures for the development of synthetic molecules. About 50% of the drugs introduced to the market during the last 20 years are derived directly or indirectly from small biogenic molecules. In the future, natural products will continue to play a major role as active substances, model molecules for the discovery and validation of drug targets. A multidisciplinary approach to drug discovery involving the generation of truly novel molecular diversity from natural product sources, combined with total and combinatorial synthetic methodologies provides the best solution to increase the productivity in drug discovery and development. Screening for new drugs in plants implies the screening of extracts for the presence of novel compounds and an investigation of their biological activities. It is currently estimated that approximately 420,000 plant species exist in nature. For the purpose of lead discovery, or for the scientific validation of a traditional medicinal plant or a phytopharmaceutical, active principals in complex matrices need to be identified. Therefore, the interfacing of biological and chemical assessment becomes the critical issue. Drug discovery from plants can be guided by epidemiologic studies facilitated with computer assisted HPLC microfractionation and microplate technology. Epidemiologic studies have shown that high dietary flavonoid intake may be associated with decreased risk for cardiovascular disease. Chlamydia pneumoniae is a common human pathogen and epidemiological and clinical studies have shown a connection between chronic C. pneumoniae infection, atherosclerosis and the risk of myocardial infarction. We will present here the detection of natural compounds active against C. pneumoniae as an example.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/0929867043365116

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Vuorela, P., Leinonen, M., Saikku, P., Tammela, P., Rauha, J., Wennberg, T., & Vuorela, H.
Venue
Current Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
1375-1389
ISSN
0929-8673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129605627
Cited by
323
References
0
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural Products in the Process of Finding New Drug Candidates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/0929867043365116
The paper
Vuorela, P., Leinonen, M., Saikku, P., Tammela, P., Rauha, J., Wennberg, T., & Vuorela, H. (2004). Natural Products in the Process of Finding New Drug Candidates. Current Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867043365116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.