The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-Adjuvanting Lipopeptide Vaccines
Abstract
Despite the important role of adjuvants for vaccine development, relatively few adjuvants have been successfully incorporated into vaccines intended for human administration. This is in part due to the high toxicity associated with many experimental adjuvants. This lack of choice effectively hinders the ability to produce vaccines against many diseases, or to improve current vaccine formulations. The conjugation of immunostimulatory lipids to peptide antigens, to produce self-adjuvanting lipopeptide vaccines, has been tested in human clinical trials. These systems appear to have a number of advantages over more traditional adjuvants (e.g. alum salts) including the capacity for these vaccines to be administered via mucosal routes (e.g. orally or nasally) instead of by injection, elicitation of antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes and mucosal immunity, as well as little-to-no observed toxicity. Several lipopeptide vaccine systems have been described in the literature, ranging from the conjugation of single fatty acid chains, to the conjugation of more complex lipids and glycolipids onto peptide antigens. The following review provides an overview of the most studied lipopeptide vaccine systems grouped into the following categories: 1) bacterial lipopeptides, including tri-palmitoyl-S-glyceryl cysteine (Pam3Cys) and di-palmitoyl-S--glyceryl cysteine (Pam2Cys); 2) the lipid-core peptide (LCP) and multiple antigen lipophilic adjuvant carrier (MALAC) systems; 3) single-chain palmitoylated peptides; and 4) glycolipids (e.g. monophosphoryl lipid A). The review also discusses the potential mechanisms of action for lipopeptide and glycolipopeptide vaccines, as well as structure activity relationships, and provides examples of studies utilising each system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peptides As Therapeutics with Enhanced Bioactivity
Goodwin, D., Simerska, P., & Toth, I. (2012) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986712803251548 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Moyle, P., & Toth, I.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- ORCID
- Moyle, Peter
- Venue
- Current Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2008-02-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 506-516
- ISSN
- 0929-8673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085613205
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Keywords
- vaccine adjuvants, mucosal vaccine delivery, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, mucosal immunity, Pam3Cys, monophosphoryl lipid A, glycolipids, structure-activity relationship, adjuvant toxicity
- MeSH terms
- Adjuvants, Immunologic, Cysteine, Humans, Lipid A, Lipids, Lipoproteins, Peptide Fragments, Structure-Activity Relationship, Vaccines, Synthetic, Lipoylation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review