A General Approach for Combining Voxel-Based Meta-Analyses Conducted in Different Neuroimaging Modalities
Abstract
Meta-analyses are useful to summarize the exponential amount of inconsistent and conflicting neuroimaging data. However, they are usually separately conducted for each different neuroimaging modality, preventing the multimodal integration of different imaging findings in a given neuropsychiatric disorder. Here, we describe an innovative method to meta-analytically combine the results of different imaging modalities, such as structural and functional paradigms. The method accounts for the presence of noise in the estimation of the p-values, and can be easily applied to any meta-analytical software. We hope that with this advanced imaging tool, researchers will be able to provide more complete multimodal pictures of the brain regions affected in different neuropsychiatric disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The AES-SDM has the capacity to adjust the raw union of probabilities to curb the false positive rate.
“The AES-SDM has the capacity to adjust the raw union of probabilities to curb the false positive rate in the worst-case scenario with regards to the presence of noise in the estimation of statistics (Norman et al., 2016; Radua et al., 2013).”
From Overlapping and differential neuropharmacological mechanisms of stimulants and nonstimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A comparative neuroimaging analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Radua et al., 2013
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Radua, J., Romeo, M., Mataix-Cols, D., & Fusar-Poli, P.
- ORCID
- Romeo, M.
- Venue
- Current Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2013-01-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 462-466
- ISSN
- 0929-8673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124990160
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- multimodal integration, neuroimaging modalities, neuropsychiatric disorders
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Software, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Functional Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review