Cited by 91Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

A General Approach for Combining Voxel-Based Meta-Analyses Conducted in Different Neuroimaging Modalities

Radua, J., Romeo, M., Mataix-Cols, D., Fusar-Poli, P.·2013·Current Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

Meta-analyses are useful to summarize the exponential amount of inconsistent and conflicting neuroimaging data. However, they are usually separately conducted for each different neuroimaging modality, preventing the multimodal integration of different imaging findings in a given neuropsychiatric disorder. Here, we describe an innovative method to meta-analytically combine the results of different imaging modalities, such as structural and functional paradigms. The method accounts for the presence of noise in the estimation of the p-values, and can be easily applied to any meta-analytical software. We hope that with this advanced imaging tool, researchers will be able to provide more complete multimodal pictures of the brain regions affected in different neuropsychiatric disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/0929867311320030017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 91

Authors
Radua, J., Romeo, M., Mataix-Cols, D., & Fusar-Poli, P.
Venue
Current Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
462-466
ISSN
0929-8673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124990160
Cited by
91
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
multimodal integration, neuroimaging modalities, neuropsychiatric disorders
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Software, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review