Pollution and Sun Exposure: A Deleterious Synergy. Mechanisms and Opportunities for Skin Protection
Abstract
Background: Pollutants are diverse chemical entities, including gases such as ozone and particulate matter PM. PM contains toxic chemicals such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Some PAHs can induce strong oxidative stress under UVA exposure. Pollution aggravates some skin diseases such as atopy or eczema, but epidemiological data also pointed to a correlation with early occurrence of (photo)-aging markers. Objective: This paper aims at reviewing current literature dealing with dermatological effects of pollution, either on in vitro models or using in vivo approaches (including humans). It particularly focuses on the probable deleterious synergy between pollutants and sunlight. Results: An exhaustive analysis of literature suggests that skin may be impacted by external stress through oxidation of some of its surface components. However, pollutants detected in plasma may also be provided to deep skin by the circulation of the blood. Oxidative stress, inflammation and metabolic impairments are among the most probable mechanisms of pollution- derived dermatological hazards. Moreover these stresses should be amplified by the deleterious synergy between pollution and sunlight. Some experiments from our lab identified few PAHs inducing a huge toxic stress, at nanomolar concentrations, when exposed to long UVA wavelengths. Prevention strategies should thus combine surface protection (long UVA sunscreens, antioxidants) and enhanced skin tissue resistance through stimulation of the natural antioxidation/detoxification pathway Nrf2. Conclusion: In people exposed to highly polluted environments, pollutants and sunlight may synergistically damage skin, requiring a specific protection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pollutants and sunlight seem to interact.
“Although pollutants and sunlight seem to interact,62 further clinical investigations are required to understand their specific impact on skin health.”
From The impact of airborne pollution on skin (2019) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 95 · Cited by 125
- Authors
- Marrot, L.
- Affiliations
- L'Oréal (France) (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Marrot, Laurent
- ORCID
- Marrot, Laurent
- Venue
- Current Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2019-01-21
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 5469-5486
- ISSN
- 0929-8673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2765262929
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- L'Oreal USA
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Keywords
- air pollution, skin damage, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, UVA, oxidative stress, particulate matter, ozone, skin aging, Nrf2 signaling, antioxidants, sunscreen, skin inflammation, atopic dermatitis, atopy
- MeSH terms
- Environmental Exposure, Environmental Pollutants, Humans, Radiation Protection, Skin, Skin Diseases, Ultraviolet Rays, Photosensitizing Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review