A systematic review of evidence-based treatment strategies for obsessive- compulsive disorder resistant to first-line pharmacotherapy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) and cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy (CBT) are first-line treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, a significant proportion of patients do not respond satisfactorily to first-choice treatments. Several options have been investigated for the management of resistant patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present paper is to systematically review the available literature concerning the strategies for the treatment of resistant adult patients with OCD. METHOD: We first reviewed studies concerning the definition of treatment-resistant OCD; we then analyzed results of studies evaluating several different strategies in resistant patients. We limited our review to double-blind, placebo-controlled studies performed in adult patients with OCD whose resistance to a first adequate (in terms of duration and dosage) SRI trial was documented and where outcome was clearly defined in terms of decrease in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) scores and/or response/ remission rates (according to the YBOCS). RESULTS: We identified five strategies supported by positive results in placebo-controlled randomized studies: 1) antipsychotic addition to SRIs (16 RCTs, of them 10 positive; 4 head-to-head RCTs); among antipsychotics, available RCTs examined the addition of haloperidol (butyrophenone), pimozide (diphenyl-butylpiperidine), risperidone (SDA: serotonin- dopamine antagonist), paliperidone (SDA), olanzapine (MARTA: multi-acting receptor targeted antipsychotic), quetiapine (MARTA) and aripiprazole (partial dopamine agonist); 2) CBT addition to medication (2 positive RCTs); 3) switch to intravenous clomipramine (SRI) administration (2 positive RCTs); 4) switch to paroxetine (SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) or venlafaxine (SNRI: serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) when the first trial was negative (1 positive RCT); and 5) the addition of medications other than an antipsychotic to SRIs (18 RCTs performed with several different compounds, with only 4 positive studies). CONCLUSION: Treatment-resistant OCD remains a significant challenge to psychiatrists. To date, the most effective strategy is the addition of antipsychotics (aripiprazole and risperidone) to SRIs; another effective strategy is CBT addition to medications. Other strategies, such as the switch to another first-line treatment or the switch to intravenous administration are promising but need further confirmation in double-blind studies. The addition of medications other than antipsychotics remains to be studied, as several negative studies exist and positive ones need confirmation (only 1 positive study).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
40-50% of patients show extremely poor responses to first-line drug therapy for OCD.
“A more significant problem is that 40–50% of patients show extremely poor responses to the first-line drug therapy, and even a larger proportion of patients' symptoms cannot be completely relieved (11).”
From Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 128 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Albert, U., Marazziti, D., Di Salvo, G., Solia, F., Rosso, G., & Maina, G.
- Affiliations
- Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga (IT)
- University of Pisa (IT)
- Rita Levi Montalcini Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Italy; A.O.U. San Luigi Gonzaga of Orbassano, Turin, Italy
- Corresponding author
- Albert, Umberto
- Venue
- Current Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2019-01-31
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 5647-5661
- ISSN
- 0929-8673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2776702330
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 128
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Shandong Academy of Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, treatment-resistant OCD, antipsychotic augmentation, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, cognitive behavioral therapy, aripiprazole, risperidone, clomipramine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, haloperidol, pimozide, olanzapine, quetiapine, Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale
- MeSH terms
- Drug Resistance, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Antipsychotic Agents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Drug Substitution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review