Epicardial adipose tissue as new cardio-metabolic risk marker and potential therapeutic target in the metabolic syndrome
Abstract
Increased visceral adiposity, is an emerging cardiovascular risk factor. There is now a compelling need to quantify visceral adipose tissue not only for diagnostic purposes, but also for therapeutic interventions with weight reduction drugs or pharmaceuticals targeted to adipose tissue, as well as anti-obesity medications, thiazolidinediones, fibrates, angiotensin receptor blockers, highly active antiretroviral therapy and hormone replacement therapy. Among visceral adipose tissues, growing evidences suggest that cardiac adiposity may play an important role in the development of an unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile. Recent papers suggest that epicardial fat, index of cardiac and visceral adiposity, could locally modulate the morphology and function of the heart. The close anatomical relationship between epicardial adipose tissue and the adjacent myocardium should readily allow local paracrine interactions between these tissues. Echocardiography has been recently proposed for the direct assessment of epicardial adipose tissue. Echocardiographic assessment of epicardial fat may be a helpful tool not only for diagnostic purposes, as marker of visceral adiposity and inflammation, but also for therapeutic interventions with drugs that can modulate the adipose tissue. In this article, epicardial adipose tissue's structure, function, method of assessment and reliability as a diagnostic tool and potential therapeutic target is reviewed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The measurability of EAT by non-invasive imaging techniques may allow its use as a tool for prediction of cardiometabolic risk and a modifiable therapeutic target.
“The great clinical implication associated with epicardial fat resides in its measurability by non-invasive imaging techniques which may allow its use as a tool for prediction of cardiometabolic risk and a modifiable therapeutic target [107].”
From Dysregulated epicardial adipose tissue as a risk factor and potential therapeutic target of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in diabetes (2022) · cites this paper as [107]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 128
- Authors
- Iacobellis, G., & Sharma, A. M.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Arya M. Sharma
- Venue
- Current Pharmaceutical Design
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2180-2184
- ISSN
- 1381-6128 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2404714294
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Pharmaceutical Design (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
- Keywords
- epicardial adipose tissue, visceral fat, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular risk, anti-obesity drugs
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Animals, Echocardiography, Humans, Pericardium, Risk, Biomarkers, Ventricular Function, Left, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, Metabolic Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review