The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Strategies to Enhance N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor-Mediated Neurotransmission in Schizophrenia, a Critical Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Although hypofunction of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated neurotransmission is proposed to play an important role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, results of the clinical trials of small molecules that enhance the NMDA function are inconsistent. A meta-analysis of all the double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in patients with schizophrenia was performed to examine their efficacy on different symptom domains, the dose-response, the effects of concomitant antipsychotics, and their side effects. About eight hundred subjects from 26 studies were included in current meta-analysis. Overall, the NMDA-enhancing molecules are effective in most schizophrenic symptom domains with the effect size (ES) of total psychopathology of 0.40 (p<1 x 10(-4)). The ES of clinical efficacy of the symptom domains were in the order of depressive (0.40, p=3 x 10(-4)), negative (0.38, p<1 x 10(-4)), cognitive (0.28, p=2 x 10(-3)), positive symptom (0.26, p=0.0006), and general psychopathology (0.26, p=0.006). Glycine, D-serine, and sarcosine treatments significantly improved multiple symptom domains, whereas D-cycloserine did not improve any symptom domain. Moderator analysis revealed that glycine, D-serine and sarcosine are better than D-cycloserine in improving the overall psychopathology. Patients receiving risperidone or olanzapine, but not clozapine, improved. No significant side effect or safety concern was noted. In addition to testing more lead compounds, long-term trials are required to determine their functional improvement capacity. Other drug targets that may enhance NMDA neurotransmission more than the molecules tested so far need to be explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Moghaddam, B., & Javitt, D. (2012) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2011.181 · Cited by 1,035
Glutamate and dopamine in schizophrenia: An update for the 21 st century
Howes, O., McCutcheon, R., & Stone, J. (2015) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881114563634 · Cited by 702
Miyamoto, S., Miyake, N., Jarskog, L. F., Fleischhacker, W. W., & Lieberman, J. A. (2012) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2012.47 · Cited by 573
Glutamate hypothesis in schizophrenia
Uno, Y., & Coyle, J. T. (2019) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.12823 · Cited by 367
Howes, O. D., Rogdaki, M., Findon, J. L., Wichers, R. H., Charman, T., King, B. H., Loth, E., McAlonan, G. M., McCracken, J. T., Parr, J. R., et al. (2018) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881117741766 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsai, G., & Lin, P.-Y.
- Venue
- Current Pharmaceutical Design
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2010-02-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 522-537
- ISSN
- 1381-6128 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014608077
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies to Enhance N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor-Mediated Neurotransmission in Schizophrenia, a Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/138161210790361452
- The paper
- Tsai, G., & Lin, P.-Y. (2010). Strategies to Enhance N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor-Mediated Neurotransmission in Schizophrenia, a Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. Current Pharmaceutical Design. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161210790361452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.