Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Strategies to Enhance N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor-Mediated Neurotransmission in Schizophrenia, a Critical Review and Meta-Analysis

Tsai, Guochuan, Lin, Pao-Yen·2010·Current Pharmaceutical Design

Abstract

Although hypofunction of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated neurotransmission is proposed to play an important role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, results of the clinical trials of small molecules that enhance the NMDA function are inconsistent. A meta-analysis of all the double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in patients with schizophrenia was performed to examine their efficacy on different symptom domains, the dose-response, the effects of concomitant antipsychotics, and their side effects. About eight hundred subjects from 26 studies were included in current meta-analysis. Overall, the NMDA-enhancing molecules are effective in most schizophrenic symptom domains with the effect size (ES) of total psychopathology of 0.40 (p<1 x 10(-4)). The ES of clinical efficacy of the symptom domains were in the order of depressive (0.40, p=3 x 10(-4)), negative (0.38, p<1 x 10(-4)), cognitive (0.28, p=2 x 10(-3)), positive symptom (0.26, p=0.0006), and general psychopathology (0.26, p=0.006). Glycine, D-serine, and sarcosine treatments significantly improved multiple symptom domains, whereas D-cycloserine did not improve any symptom domain. Moderator analysis revealed that glycine, D-serine and sarcosine are better than D-cycloserine in improving the overall psychopathology. Patients receiving risperidone or olanzapine, but not clozapine, improved. No significant side effect or safety concern was noted. In addition to testing more lead compounds, long-term trials are required to determine their functional improvement capacity. Other drug targets that may enhance NMDA neurotransmission more than the molecules tested so far need to be explored.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/138161210790361452

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Tsai, G., & Lin, P.-Y.
Venue
Current Pharmaceutical Design
Published
2010-02-01
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
522-537
ISSN
1381-6128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014608077
Cited by
269
References
0
FWCI
18.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies to Enhance N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor-Mediated Neurotransmission in Schizophrenia, a Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/138161210790361452
The paper
Tsai, G., & Lin, P.-Y. (2010). Strategies to Enhance N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor-Mediated Neurotransmission in Schizophrenia, a Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. Current Pharmaceutical Design. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161210790361452

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.