Cited by 311Schizophrenia research and treatmentReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Third Generation Antipsychotic Drugs: Partial Agonism or Receptor Functional Selectivity?

Open access
Mailman, Richard, Murthy, Vishakantha·2010·Current Pharmaceutical Design

Abstract

Functional selectivity is the term that describes drugs that cause markedly different signaling through a single receptor (e.g., full agonist at one pathway and antagonist at a second). It has been widely recognized recently that this phenomenon impacts the understanding of mechanism of action of some drugs, and has relevance to drug discovery. One of the clinical areas where this mechanism has particular importance is in the treatment of schizophrenia. Antipsychotic drugs have been grouped according to both pattern of clinical action and mechanism of action. The original antipsychotic drugs such as chlorpromazine and haloperidol have been called typical or first generation. They cause both antipsychotic actions and many side effects (extrapyramidal and endocrine) that are ascribed to their high affinity dopamine D(2) receptor antagonism. Drugs such as clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone and others were then developed that avoided the neurological side effects (atypical or second generation antipsychotics). These compounds are divided mechanistically into those that are high affinity D(2) and 5-HT(2A) antagonists, and those that also bind with modest affinity to D(2), 5-HT(2A), and many other neuroreceptors. There is one approved third generation drug, aripiprazole, whose actions have been ascribed alternately to either D(2) partial agonism or D(2) functional selectivity. Although partial agonism has been the more widely accepted mechanism, the available data are inconsistent with this mechanism. Conversely, the D(2) functional selectivity hypothesis can accommodate all current data for aripiprazole, and also impacts on discovery compounds that are not pure D(2) antagonists.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/138161210790361461

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 164 · Cited by 311

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [12]Jenner P Demirdemar R 1997 Dopamine receptor sub-types: from basic sciences to clinical applications IOS Press Burke, VA
  2. [74]Kenakin T 1997 Pharmacologic analysis of drug-receptor interaction Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia
  3. [75]Furchgott RF 1966 The use of -haloalkylamines in the differentiation of receptors and in the determination of dissociation constants of receptor-agonist complexes Advances in Drug Research Harper NJ Simmonds AB 21 55 Academic Press New York

Authors
Mailman, R., & Murthy, V.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Current Pharmaceutical Design
Published
2010-02-01
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
488-501
ISSN
1381-6128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964684914
Cited by
311
References
164
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Pharmaceutical Design (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH040537, U19MH082441, MH082441, R01MH040537)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
third-generation antipsychotics, aripiprazole, functional selectivity, partial agonism, dopamine D2 receptor, schizophrenia, atypical antipsychotics, receptor signaling, mechanism of action, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Aripiprazole, Animals, Humans, Models, Neurological, Terminology as Topic, Piperazines, Serotonin Antagonists, Antipsychotic Agents, Quinolones, Molecular Structure, Signal Transduction, Drugs, Investigational, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Drug Partial Agonism, Drug Discovery, Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review