Cited by 15Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

Theranostic Applications of Nanomaterials in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Multifunctional Approach

Tripathi, Priyanka, Shukla, Poonam, Bieberich, Erhard·2022·Current Pharmaceutical Design

Abstract

: The blood-brain barrier (BBB) prevents the transfer of many therapeutic drugs across the brain. Therefore, the leading treatment strategies of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are often unsuccessful. Another challenge is to achieve specific targetability across BBB and diagnosis. Herein, theranostic-based strategies are emerging in order to combine therapeutic, targeting, and diagnostic capabilities. Recent nanotechnological advancements enable a common platform for the formulation and development of efficient theranostics. This can be attained by engineering some of the properties of nanomaterials, thus enabling them to become efficient and suitable theranostics. In this review, we discuss the various novel approaches of theranostic nanomaterials owing to multimodal functionality across the brain as an effective and probable treatment as well as early (timely) diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. In this respect, we conducted a PubMed search to review the latest development in theranostic nanomaterials, especially for Alzheimer’s (major type of dementia) therapy that led us to discuss the present theranostic nanomaterials utilizing drug carriers that include cargo, targeting ligands, and imaging agents for delivery to particular tissues, cells, or subcellular components. Our focus is on strategies for syntheses, but we will also consider the challenges and prospects associated with this evolving technology. The current review includes knowledge of the history, overview of AD, and therapeutics with a future approach of using theranostic nanomaterials as personalized medicines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1381612827666211122153946

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 15

Authors
Tripathi, P., Shukla, P., & Bieberich, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Veer Kunwar Singh University (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Tripathi, Priyanka
  • Bieberich, Erhard
Venue
Current Pharmaceutical Design
Published
2022-01
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
116-132
ISSN
1381-6128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3215900905
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Pharmaceutical Design (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (R01AG034389, R01AG064234)
  • VA (I01BX003643)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, theranostic nanomaterials, blood-brain barrier, drug delivery, drug carriers, targeting ligands, imaging agents, multimodal diagnosis, early diagnosis, nanomaterial synthesis, personalized medicine, nanomedicine
MeSH terms
Theranostic Nanomedicine, Alzheimer Disease, Drug Carriers, Humans, Nanostructures, Nanoparticles, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review