The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational Methods in Developing Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR): A Review
Abstract
Virtual filtering and screening of combinatorial libraries have recently gained attention as methods complementing the high-throughput screening and combinatorial chemistry. These chemoinformatic techniques rely heavily on quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis, a field with established methodology and successful history. In this review, we discuss the computational methods for building QSAR models. We start with outlining their usefulness in high-throughput screening and identifying the general scheme of a QSAR model. Following, we focus on the methodologies in constructing three main components of QSAR model, namely the methods for describing the molecular structure of compounds, for selection of informative descriptors and for activity prediction. We present both the well-established methods as well as techniques recently introduced into the QSAR domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,522
Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs (3rd ed.)
Michalewicz, Z. (1996) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 553
Pattern Recognition and Signal Processing
(1978) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9941-1 · Cited by 354
Readings in computer vision: issues, problems, principles, and paradigms
Fischler, M. A., & Firschein, O. (1987) · Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. eBooks · Cited by 245
Cited by
Convolutional embedding of attributed molecular graphs for physical property prediction
Coley, C. W., Barzilay, R., Green, W. H., Jaakkola, T. S., & Jensen, K. F. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00601 · Cited by 470
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technology Driven Modern Drug Discovery and Development
Sarkar, C., Das, B., Rawat, V. S., Wahlang, J. B., Nongpiur, A., Tiewsoh, I., Lyngdoh, N. M., Das, D., Bidarolli, M., & Sony, H. T. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24032026 · Cited by 347
Review of Aquatic Toxicity of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products to Algae
Xin, X., Huang, G., & Zhang, B. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124619 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Dudek, A., Arodz, T., & Galvez, J.
- Venue
- Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2006-03-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 213-228
- ISSN
- 1386-2073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163646378
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational Methods in Developing Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR): A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/138620706776055539
- The paper
- Dudek, A., Arodz, T., & Galvez, J. (2006). Computational Methods in Developing Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR): A Review. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening. https://doi.org/10.2174/138620706776055539
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.