The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epidemiology of NHP-Drug Interactions: Identification and Evaluation
Abstract
Increasing numbers of adults and children around the world are using natural health products (NHPs) to promote wellbeing or alleviate illness. Although often considered safe due to their natural origin, NHPs are potentially pharmacologically active and, therefore may cause harm. Limited data suggest that NHPs can interact with other NHPs as well as with prescription medication and foods. Although some common NHP-drug interactions have been identified and studied, in general, the epidemiology of NHP-drug interactions is not well-understood, in part because these harms are often underreported. Users rarely disclose NHP use to their physicians, and physicians rarely enquire about such use. Even if physicians become aware of a potential NHP-drug interaction, passive surveillance systems mean that it is left to the physician's discretion whether or not to report it to the proper authority. It is likely that active surveillance of NHP-drug interactions would result in increased reporting of NHP-related harms as well as better quality reports. Subsequent lab investigation would determine if adulteration, contamination, species misidentification, or misuse was responsible for the harm, or if a pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic NHP-drug interaction occurred. This kind of thorough detection and investigation of potential NHP-drug interactions is necessary to ensure the safe use of NHPs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“NHPs are often perceived to be safe due to their natural origin; however they are pharmacologically active and can interact with other NHPs, prescription medicines, and foods (Brulotte and Vohra 2008, Singh and Levine 2007) causing adverse effects.”
From Regulation of Natural Health Products in Canada (2009) · cites this paper as Brulotte and Vohra 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Regulation of Natural Health Products in Canada
MINE, Y., & YOUNG, D. (2009) · Food Science and Technology Research · doi:10.3136/fstr.15.459 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Brulotte, J., & Vohra, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Vohra, S.
- ORCID
- Vohra, S.
- Venue
- Current Drug Metabolism
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2008-12-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1049-1054
- ISSN
- 1389-2002 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074934651
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Drug Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Nephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants
- Keywords
- natural health products, herbal medicine safety, underreporting of adverse events, active surveillance, passive surveillance, adulteration, contamination, species misidentification, pharmacokinetic interactions, pharmacodynamic interactions, disclosure to physicians, adverse event reporting
- MeSH terms
- Complementary Therapies, Humans, Knowledge, Herb-Drug Interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review