The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microbial Enzymatic Degradation of Biodegradable Plastics
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The renewable feedstock derived biodegradable plastics are important in various industries such as packaging, agricultural, paper coating, garbage bags and biomedical implants. The increasing water and waste pollution due to the available decomposition methods of plastic degradation have led to the emergence of biodegradable plastics and biological degradation with microbial (bacteria and fungi) extracellular enzymes. The microbes utilize biodegradable polymers as the substrate under starvation and in unavailability of microbial nutrients. Microbial enzymatic degradation is suitable from bioremediation point of view as no waste accumulation occurs. METHODS: It is important to understand the microbial interaction and mechanism involved in the enzymatic degradation of biodegradable plastics under the influence of several environmental factors such as applied pH, thermo-stability, substrate molecular weight and/or complexity. To study the surface erosion of polymer film is another approach for hydrolytic degradation characteristion. RESULTS: The degradation of biopolymer is associated with the production of low molecular weight monomer and generation of carbon dioxide, methane and water molecule. This review reported the degradation study of various existing biodegradable plastics along with the potent degrading microbes (bacteria and fungi). Patents available on plastic biodegradation with biotechnological significance is also summarized in this paper. CONCLUSION: This paper assesses that new disposal technique should be adopted for the degradation of polymers and further research is required for the economical production of biodegradable plastics along with their enzymatic degradation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanical Recycling of Packaging Plastics: A Review
Schyns, Z. O. G., & Shaver, M. P. (2021) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.202000415 · Cited by 1,643
Qin, M., Chen, C., Song, B., Shen, M., Cao, W., Yang, H., Zeng, G., & Gong, J. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127816 · Cited by 455
Cai, Z., Li, M., Zhu, Z., Wang, X., Huang, Y., Li, T., Gong, H., & Yan, M. (2023) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms11071661 · Cited by 452
Fan, P., Yu, H., Xi, B., & Tan, W. (2022) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107244 · Cited by 341
Kim, H. R., Lee, H. M., Yu, H. C., Jeon, E., Lee, S., Li, J., & Kim, D.-H. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c01495 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Roohi, Bano, K., Kuddus, M., Zaheer, M. R., Zia, Q., Khan, M. F., Ashraf, G. M., Gupta, A., & Aliev, G.
- Venue
- Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2017-07-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 429-440
- ISSN
- 1389-2010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2617050941
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial Enzymatic Degradation of Biodegradable Plastics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/1389201018666170523165742
- The paper
- Roohi, Bano, K., Kuddus, M., Zaheer, M. R., Zia, Q., Khan, M. F., Ashraf, G. M., Gupta, A., & Aliev, G. (2017). Microbial Enzymatic Degradation of Biodegradable Plastics. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389201018666170523165742
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.