Novel Sulfones with Antifungal Properties: Antifungal Activities and Interactions with Candida spp. Virulence Factors
Abstract
Since candidiasis is so difficult to eradicate with an antifungal treatment and the existing antimycotics display many limitations, hopefully new sulfone derivatives may overcome these deficiencies. It is pertinent to study new strategies such as sulfone derivatives targeting the virulence attributes of C. albicans that differentiate them from the host. During infections, the pathogenic potential of C. albicans relies on the virulence factors as follows: hydrolytic enzymes, transcriptional factors, adhesion, and development of biofilms. In the article we explored how the above-presented C. albicans fitness and virulence attributes provided a robust response to the environmental stress exerted by sulfones upon C. albicans; C. albicans fitness and virulence attributes are fungal properties whose inactivation attenuates virulence. Our understanding of how these mechanisms and factors are inhibited by sulfones has increased over the last years. As lack of toxicity is a prerequisite for medical approaches, sulfones (non-toxic as assessed in vitro and in vivo) may prove to be useful for reducing C. albicans pathogenesis in humans. The antifungal activity of sulfones dealing with these multiple virulence factors and fitness attributes is discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Current antifungal therapies for mucosal candidiasis are constrained by limited number of available agents, adverse effects, and escalating drug resistance.
“However, these therapeutic options are constrained by the limited number of available antifungal agents, treatment‐associated adverse effects, and the escalating problem of drug resistance [10, 11].”
From Statins as Antifungal Agents: A Review on Drug Repurposing and Nanotechnology-Driven Delivery Strategies (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 110 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Gizińska, M., Staniszewska, M., & Ochal, Z.
- Affiliations
- Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego PZH – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy (PL)
- Warsaw University of Technology (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Staniszewska, Monika
- Ochal, Zbigniew
- Venue
- Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2018-12-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12-21
- ISSN
- 1389-5575 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2894531340
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry (9EM-5N/2016, 10/EM 1/2017, 11/EM/2018)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- sulfone derivatives, antifungal agents, Candida albicans, candidiasis, fungal virulence factors, biofilm formation, adhesion, hydrolytic enzymes, transcription factors, antifungal resistance, environmental stress response, non-toxicity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Humans, Sulfones, Virulence, Biofilms, Virulence Factors, Drug Discovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review