Cited by 18Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementNeuroprotection in Cerebral IschemiaNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What have Genetically Engineered Mice Taught Us About Ischemic Injury?

Liang, Dong, Dawson, Ted, Dawson, Valina·2004·Current Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Stroke, is the third leading cause of death and disability in the Western world. Stroke refers to set of ischemic conditions resulting from the occlusion or hemorrhage of blood vessels supplying the brain. Loss of blood flow to the brain results in neuronal injury due to both oxygen and nutrient deprivation and the activation of injurious signal cascades. Ultimately cerebral ischemia results in death and dysfunction of brain cells, and neurological deficits that reflect the location and size of the compromised brain area. Injury due to ischemic stroke occurs by a highly choreographed series of complex spatial and temporal events that evolve over hours to days. These events involve complex interactions between fundamental cell injury mechanisms including excitotoxicity and ionic imbalance, oxidative and nitrosative stress, apoptotic-like cell death and inflammatory responses. Genetically engineered mice have been valuable tools to probe putative mechanisms of neuronal death and uncover potential strategies that might render neurons resistant to ischemic injury. Findings from experimental stroke studies in genetically engineered animals are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1566524043479194

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pronounced loss and gradual degeneration of dendritic structure and spines at longer time points (>7 h) are consistent with ischemia activating signal transduction cascades that lead to apoptosis or necrosis.

    “However, the pronounced loss and gradual degeneration of dendritic structure and spines at longer time points (Ͼ7 h) (supplemental Fig. 1a, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material) are consistent with ischemia, activating signal transduction cascades that lead to apoptosis or necrosis (Liang et al., 2004).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liang, D., Dawson, T., & Dawson, V.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Current Molecular Medicine
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
207-225
ISSN
1566-5240 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120151830
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 39148, P01NS039148)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroprotection in Cerebral Ischemia
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
ischemic stroke, cerebral ischemia, genetically modified mice, neuronal injury, excitotoxicity, ionic imbalance, oxidative stress, nitrosative stress, apoptosis, neuroinflammation, neuroprotection
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Injuries, Cell Membrane, Cell Nucleus, Brain Ischemia, Cloning, Molecular, Disease Models, Animal, Growth Substances, Humans, Inflammation, Mice, Transgenic, Nitrogen, Signal Transduction, Apoptosis, Oxidative Stress, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review