Cited by 93Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsDrug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chitosan-Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Matrices as Carriers for Hydrodynamically Balanced Capsules of Moxifloxacin HCl

Verma, Anurag, Dubey, Juhi, Verma, Navneet, Kumar Nayak, Amit·2017·Current Drug Delivery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, gastroretentive, hydrodynamically balanced system (HBS) for stomach-specific floating sustained drug release has gained a lot of importance in improving absorption of drugs especially those absorbed from stomach and small intestine. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current investigation is to evaluate chitosan-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) based on polymeric matrices as a carrier for single-unit capsules based on HBS for stomach- specific floating sustained drug release using moxifloxacin HCl (MX) as a model drug. METHOD: Various HBS capsules of MX were prepared by physical blending of MX with chitosan (low or medium molecular mass) or HPMC (K4M or K15M) or chitosan-HPMC combinations in varying proportions followed by encapsulation into size 0 capsules made of hard gelatin. The in vitro buoyancy and drug release in 0.1 N HCl (pH 1.2) were evaluated. RESULTS: HBS capsules based on chitosan (low and medium molecular weight and their combination) as polymer matrix failed to float on 0.1 N HCl (pH 1.2). Whereas, formulations containing HPMC (K4M or K15M) or their mixture with chitosan, remained buoyant and released MX over 9 h in the acidic dissolution medium following zero-order kinetics. CONCLUSION: HPMC (K4M, K15M, blend of K4M and K15M) or their mixture with low/medium molecular mass chitosan may constitute excellent carrier systems for the stomach-specific sustained delivery of MX over a longer period.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1567201813666160504100842

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 93

Metadata

Authors
Verma, A., Dubey, J., Verma, N., & Kumar Nayak, A.
Venue
Current Drug Delivery
Published
2017-01-09
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
83-90
ISSN
1567-2018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2345787125
Cited by
93
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Drug Delivery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
hydrodynamically balanced systems, gastroretentive drug delivery, chitosan, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, moxifloxacin hydrochloride, buoyancy, in vitro drug release, zero-order release, gastric drug delivery
MeSH terms
Moxifloxacin, Drug Carriers, Molecular Structure, Fluoroquinolones, Chitosan, Hydrodynamics, Hypromellose Derivatives, Drug Liberation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review