CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 101Computational Drug Discovery MethodsGraph theory and applicationsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 230 of the 231 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

General Theory for Multiple Input-Output Perturbations in Complex Molecular Systems. 1. Linear QSPR Electronegativity Models in Physical, Organic, and Medicinal Chemistry

Gonzalez-Diaz, Humberto, Arrasate, Sonia, Gomez-SanJuan, Asier, Sotomayor, Nuria, Lete, Esther, Besada-Porto, Lina, Ruso, Juan·2013·Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
DOI 10.2174/1568026611313140011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In general perturbation methods starts with a known exact solution of a problem and add "small" variation terms in order to approach to a solution for a related problem without known exact solution. Perturbation theory has been widely used in almost all areas of science. Bhor's quantum model, Heisenberg's matrix mechanincs, Feyman diagrams, and Poincare's chaos model or "butterfly effect" in complex systems are examples of perturbation theories. On the other hand, the study of Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships (QSPR) in molecular complex systems is an ideal area for the application of perturbation theory. There are several problems with exact experimental solutions (new chemical reactions, physicochemical properties, drug activity and distribution, metabolic networks, etc.) in public databases like CHEMBL. However, in all these cases, we have an even larger list of related problems without known solutions. We need to know the change in all these properties after a perturbation of initial boundary conditions. It means, when we test large sets of similar, but different, compounds and/or chemical reactions under the slightly different conditions (temperature, time, solvents, enzymes, assays, protein targets, tissues, partition systems, organisms, etc.). However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no QSPR general-purpose perturbation theory to solve this problem. In this work, firstly we review general aspects and applications of both perturbation theory and QSPR models. Secondly, we formulate a general-purpose perturbation theory for multiple-boundary QSPR problems. Last, we develop three new QSPR-Perturbation theory models. The first model classify correctly >100,000 pairs of intra-molecular carbolithiations with 75-95% of Accuracy (Ac), Sensitivity (Sn), and Specificity (Sp). The model predicts probabilities of variations in the yield and enantiomeric excess of reactions due to at least one perturbation in boundary conditions (solvent, temperature, temperature of addition, or time of reaction). The model also account for changes in chemical structure (connectivity structure and/or chirality paterns in substrate, product, electrophile agent, organolithium, and ligand of the asymmetric catalyst). The second model classifies more than 150,000 cases with 85-100% of Ac, Sn, and Sp. The data contains experimental shifts in up to 18 different pharmacological parameters determined in >3000 assays of ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Elimination, and Toxicity) properties and/or interactions between 31723 drugs and 100 targets (metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, or organisms). The third model classifies more than 260,000 cases of perturbations in the self-aggregation of drugs and surfactants to form micelles with Ac, Sn, and Sp of 94-95%. The model predicts changes in 8 physicochemical and/or thermodynamics output parameters (critic micelle concentration, aggregation number, degree of ionization, surface area, enthalpy, free energy, entropy, heat capacity) of self-aggregation due to perturbations. The perturbations refers to changes in initial temperature, solvent, salt, salt concentration, solvent, and/or structure of the anion or cation of more than 150 different drugs and surfactants. QSPR-Perturbation Theory models may be useful for multi-objective optimization of organic synthesis, physicochemical properties, biological activity, metabolism, and distribution profiles towards the design of new drugs, surfactants, asymmetric ligands for catalysts, and other materials.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1568026611313140011

Cites

230 of 230 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 101

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gonzalez-Diaz, H., Arrasate, S., Gomez-SanJuan, A., Sotomayor, N., Lete, E., Besada-Porto, L., & Ruso, J.
ORCID
Venue
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
Publisher
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Published
2013-08-01
Volume
13
Issue
14
Pages
1713-1741
ISSN
1568-0266 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2174/1568026611313140011
OpenAlex
W2137226045
Cited by
101
References
231
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6
FWCI
9.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Graph theory and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
QSPR, perturbation theory, electronegativity, carbolithiation, organolithium reactions, asymmetric catalysis, enantiomeric excess, reaction yield prediction, molecular descriptors, drug activity prediction, metabolic networks, drug repurposing
MeSH terms
Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Models, Molecular, Proteins, Quantum Theory, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review