Diabetes discharge planning and transitions of care: a focused review
Abstract
Background: Diabetes is a growing problem in the United States. Increasing hospital admissions for diabetes patients demonstrate the need for evidence-based care of diabetes patients by inpatient providers, as well as the importance of continuity of care when transitioning patients from inpatient to outpatient providers. Methods: A focused literature review of discharge planning and transitions of care in diabetes, conducted in PubMed is presented. Studies were selected for inclusion based on content focusing on transitions of care in diabetes, risk factors for readmission, the impact of inpatient diabetes education on patient outcomes, and optimal medication management of diabetes during care transitions. American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines for care of patients during the discharge process are presented, as well as considerations for designing treatment regimens for a hospitalized patient transitioning to various care settings. Results: Multiple factors may make transitions of care difficult, including poor communication, poor patient education, inappropriate follow-up, and clinically complex patients. ADA recommendations provide guidance, but an individualized approach for medication management is needed. Use of scoring systems may help identify patients at higher risk for readmission. Good communication with patients and outpatient providers is needed to prevent patient harm. A team-based approach is needed, utilizing the skills of inpatient and outpatient providers, diabetes educators, nurses, and pharmacists. Conclusion: Structured discharge planning per guideline recommendations can help improve transitions in care for patients with diabetes. A team based, patient-centered approach can help improve patient outcomes by reducing medication errors, delay of care, and hospital readmissions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The post-hospitalization period is critical for diabetes care: gaps in follow-up, medication mismanagement, or worsening conditions can precipitate acute complications and costly ED visits.
“The post-hospitalization period is critical for diabetes care: gaps in follow-up, medication mismanagement, or worsening conditions can precipitate acute complications and costly ED visits [7,10–12].”
From Machine learning-driven risk prediction for post-hospitalization diabetes case management: Integrating clinical and social determinants of health (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 21 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Black, R. L., & Duval, C.
- Affiliations
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Black, Robin L.
- ORCID
- Black, Robin L.
- Venue
- Current Diabetes Reviews
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2019-01-18
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-117
- ISSN
- 1573-3998 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2868507488
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Diabetes Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- diabetes mellitus, discharge planning, care transitions, hospital readmission, medication management, continuity of care, patient-centered care, team-based care, medication errors, risk scoring, American Diabetes Association guidelines
- MeSH terms
- Aftercare, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Patient Discharge, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Transfer, Societies, Medical, United States, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Medication Reconciliation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review