First Episode Psychosis, Substance Abuse and Prognosis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether first episode psychosis (FEP) patients who meet criteria for substance abuse have worse outcomes than FEP patients who do not abuse substances. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, PSYCHInfo, Cochrane controlled trial register, and other databases to find prospective studies comparing outcomes for FEP patients with and without substance abuse. Both schizophrenia spectrum and affective spectrum patients were included in the review. Outcomes included positive and negative symptoms, risk of relapse, re-hospitalization, treatment compliance and psychosocial variables. Results: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria. Compared to FEP patients without substance abuse, patients with substance abuse experienced increased positive symptoms in five out of seven studies; increased risk of relapse in two out of two studies; and increased risk of poor treatment compliance in three out of five studies. Only one of six studies examining negative symptoms found a significant association with substance abuse and only one out of eight studies found any associations between psychosocial outcomes and substance abuse. Conclusions: FEP patients with co-morbid substance abuse may experience increased risk of relapse, increased positive symptoms and poor compliance, but negative symptoms and psychosocial variables may not be affected. Keywords: First episode psychosis, cannabis abuse, alcohol abuse, prognosis, outcome studies, systematic review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Substance misuse has deleterious impact on psychotic symptoms and treatment outcomes and is related to adversity sequelae.
“despite its similarly deleterious impact on psychotic symptoms and outcomes of treatment [13] and its relationship with AEs sequelae (e.g., PTSD symptoms, depressive symptoms).”
From Outcomes of an adapted prolonged exposure psychotherapy for people with early phase psychosis, substance misuse, and a history of adversity: the PE + trial (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Archie, S., & Gyomorey, K.
- ORCID
- Archie, Suzanne
- Venue
- Current Psychiatry Reviews
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2009-08-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 153-163
- ISSN
- 1573-4005 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005657888
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Psychiatry Reviews (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Keywords
- first-episode psychosis, substance abuse, prognosis, relapse, medication adherence, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, psychosocial outcomes, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, affective spectrum disorders, cannabis use disorder, alcohol abuse, comorbidities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review