The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MRI Contrast Agents: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in clinical diagnostics, for a rapidly growing number of indications. The MRI technique is non-invasive and can provide information on the anatomy, function and metabolism of tissues in vivo. MRI scans of tissue anatomy and function make use of the two hydrogen atoms in water to generate the image. Apart from differences in the local water content, the basic contrast in the MR image mainly results from regional differences in the intrinsic relaxation times T1 and T2, each of which can be independently chosen to dominate image contrast. However, the intrinsic contrast provided by the water T1 and T2 and changes in their values brought about by tissue pathology are often too limited to enable a sensitive and specific diagnosis. For that reason increasing use is made of MRI contrast agents that alter the image contrast following intravenous injection. The degree and location of the contrast changes provide substantial diagnostic information. Certain contrast agents are predominantly used to shorten the T1 relaxation time and these are mainly based on low-molecular weight chelates of the gadolinium ion (Gd3+). The most widely used T2 shortening agents are based on iron oxide (FeO) particles. Depending on their chemical composition, molecular structure and overall size, the in vivo distribution volume and pharmacokinetic properties vary widely between different contrast agents and these largely determine their use in specific diagnostic tests. This review describes the current status, as well as recent and future developments of MRI contrast agents with focus on applications in oncology. First the basis of MR image contrast and how it is altered by contrast agents will be discussed. After some considerations on bioavailability and pharmacokinetics, specific applications of contrast agents will be presented according to their specific purposes, starting with non-specific contrast agents used in classical contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Next targeted contrast agents, which are actively directed towards a specific molecular target using an appropriate ligand, functional contrast agents, mainly used for functional brain and heart imaging, smart contrast agents, which generate contrast as a response to a change in their physical environment as a consequence of some biological process, and finally cell labeling agents will be presented. To conclude some future perspectives are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Applications of nanoparticles for diagnosis and therapy of cancer
Baetke, S. C., Lammers, T., & Kiessling, F. (2015) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20150207 · Cited by 494
Nanoparticles as contrast agents for in-vivo bioimaging: current status and future perspectives
Hahn, M. A., Singh, A. K., Sharma, P., Brown, S. C., & Moudgil, B. M. (2011) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-4207-5 · Cited by 485
Manganese-based MRI contrast agents: past, present, and future
Pan, D., Schmieder, A. H., Wickline, S. A., & Lanza, G. M. (2011) · Tetrahedron · doi:10.1016/j.tet.2011.07.076 · Cited by 419
MRI in multiple sclerosis: current status and future prospects
Bakshi, R., Thompson, A. J., Rocca, M. A., Pelletier, D., Dousset, V., Barkhof, F., Inglese, M., Guttmann, C. R., Horsfield, M. A., & Filippi, M. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70137-6 · Cited by 348
Titanium Dioxide in the Service of the Biomedical Revolution
Rajh, T., Dimitrijevic, N. M., Bissonnette, M., Koritarov, T., & Konda, V. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500029g · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Strijkers, G. J., M. Mulder, W. J., F. van Tilborg, G. A., & Nicolay, K.
- Venue
- Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-305
- ISSN
- 1568-0118 (ISSN-L)
- 1871-5206
- OpenAlex
- W2121704606
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MRI Contrast Agents: Current Status and Future Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/187152007780618135
- The paper
- Strijkers, G. J., M. Mulder, W. J., F. van Tilborg, G. A., & Nicolay, K. (2007). MRI Contrast Agents: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.2174/187152007780618135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.