Cited by 87Natural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesMedicinal Plant ResearchComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Efficacy of dietary supplementation with botanicals on carbohydrate metabolism in humans

Cefalu, William, Ye, Jianping, Wang, Zhong·2008·Endocrine‚ Metabolic & Immune Disorders-Drug Targets

Abstract

Botanical products are widely used in nutritional supplementation for promotion of health or prevention of diseases. With the high prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes, abnormalities in carbohydrate metabolism are common in the general population and obtaining glycemic control is important in reducing the complications of diabetes. If shown to be effective, botanical products have a unique position in potentially aiding the general public in regard to obesity and diabetes. They can be obtained "over-the-counter" and may have less side effects compared to many synthetic drugs. Although most of the popular botanicals have a long history in folk medicine, there is paucity of data regarding their efficacy and safety, particularly as it relates to human studies. In this review, we discuss the data that was available in the literature for nine botanicals that are frequently promoted to help manage blood glucose. They are Bitter Melon (Momordica charantia), Fenugreek (trigonella foenum graecum), Gymnema Sylvestre, Ivy Gourd (Coccinia indica), Nopal or Prickly Pear Cactus (Opuntia streptacantha), Ginseng, Aloe Vera, Russian Tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus), and Garlic (Allium sativum). The discussion is emphasized on the clinical aspect of these botanicals. Due to the lack of sufficient evidence from clinical studies for any of the botanicals reviewed, it is premature to actively recommend use of any particular herb to treat either glucose or other risk factors. Thus, well defin…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/187153008784534376

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cefalu, W., Ye, J., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
Venue
Endocrine‚ Metabolic & Immune Disorders-Drug Targets
Published
2008-06-01
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
78-81
ISSN
1871-5303 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144323060
Cited by
87
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Metabolic & Immune Disorders - Drug Targets (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (P50AT002776)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
herbal supplements, carbohydrate metabolism, glycemic control, blood glucose, type 2 diabetes, obesity, Momordica charantia, fenugreek, Gymnema sylvestre, Coccinia indica, Opuntia streptacantha, ginseng, Aloe vera, Artemisia dracunculus, garlic, herbal medicine, clinical evidence
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Dietary Supplements, Plant Preparations, Carbohydrate Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review