Cited by 15Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksNutrition, Genetics, and Disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Trends in Metabolic Syndrome and Gene Networks in Human and Rodent Models

Kraja, Aldi, Province, Michael, Huang, Pinchia, Jarvis, Joseph, Rice, Treva, Cheverud, James, Rao, D.·2008·Endocrine‚ Metabolic & Immune Disorders-Drug Targets

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) can be considered a pheno-physiological cluster of metabolically interrelated risk factors for diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. MetS has emerged as a result of complex interactions among environmental stresses and MetS gene networks and their products. In this review we summarize trends in MetS definitions, their associated controversies and possibilities for their refinement. The National Cholesterol Education Program MetS definition with its improvements by the American Heart Association and NHLBI Conference has the potential to become the primary clinical definition of MetS. For the first time, by reviewing a large body of literature, we construct MetS gene networks in humans and in rodents. These MetS gene networks can serve as a budding platform to develop new hypotheses regarding the genetic mechanisms underlying MetS. We also extend the notion of MetS to mouse models. New and improved molecular genomics and proteomic tools have been developed in parallel with the MetS epidemic which in conjunction with improved and novel computational statistical methods have magnified the genetic resolution of MetS analyses. Our results justify the existence of MetS as a meaningful syndrome and suggest that a better understanding of its etiology can benefit the health of human kind.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/187153008785700145

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genes associated with lipids and lipid changes were already identified as part of the MetS gene network.

    “It is important to mention that genes associated with lipids and lipid changes were already identified as part of the MetS gene network [5].”

    From Fenofibrate and metabolic syndrome (2010) · cites this paper as [5]

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 6 · Cited by 15

Metadata

Authors
Kraja, A., Province, M., Huang, P., Jarvis, J., Rice, T., Cheverud, J., & Rao, D.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Endocrine‚ Metabolic & Immune Disorders-Drug Targets
Published
2008-09-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
198-207
ISSN
1871-5303 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137585654
Cited by
15
References
6
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Metabolic & Immune Disorders - Drug Targets (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL056567)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, gene networks, metabolic syndrome definitions, NCEP criteria, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, genetic etiology, mouse model, proteomics, rodent models
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Metabolic Syndrome, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine, Mice, Rats, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review