Cited by 97Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalChemical Synthesis and CharacterizationExtraction and Separation Processes

Use of Natural Clinoptilolite to Improve Water Quality: Sorption and Selectivity Studies of Lead(II), Copper(II), Zinc(II), and Nickel(II)

Oter, Ozlem, Akcay, Husamettin·2007·Water Environment Research

Abstract

Natural clinoptilolite can be used as an ion exchanger for removal of heavy metals and treatment of environmental pollution because of its desirable characteristics of high ion exchange selectivity and resistance to different media. In this work, the potential of natural clinoptilolite from Gördes mines (West Anatolia, Turkey) for the uptake of lead(II), nickel(II), copper(II), and zinc(II), from their single and mixed ion solutions, was evaluated using the batch method. The mineralogical and chemical properties of the sorption material were carried out by X‐ray diffraction, X‐ray fluoremetry, scanning electron microscopy, and wet analysis. Contact time, initial solution pH, solid‐to‐liquid ratio, and initial metal cation concentration were determined as single ion sorption parameters. The silicon/aluminum ratio and the theoretical and equivalent exchange capacities, both in single and mixed solutions, were established. Corresponding adsorption constants and distribution coefficients have been found.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2175/106143006x111880

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Natural zeolites show a higher affinity for certain heavy metals.

    “These parameters and the chemistries of natural zeolites influence their cation exchange property, especially their selectivity, whereby natural zeolites show a higher affinity for certain heavy metals (Oter and Akcay, 2007;Wang and Peng, 2010).”

    From Adsorption of heavy metals on natural zeolites: A review (2023) · cites this paper as Oter and Akcay, 2007

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 97

Authors
Oter, O., & Akcay, H.
Affiliations
Dokuz Eylül University (TR)
Venue
Water Environment Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
329-335
ISSN
  • 0043-1303 (ISSN-L)
  • 1061-4303
  • 1554-7531
OpenAlex
W2416188426
Cited by
97
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Environment Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Dokuz Eylül University Research Fund (İzmir, Turkey) (0922200128)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Chemical Synthesis and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
clinoptilolite, natural zeolite, heavy metal removal, lead(II), copper(II), zinc(II), nickel(II), ion exchange, sorption, mixed metal solutions, ion exchange selectivity, exchange capacity, distribution coefficient, adsorption isotherms, water treatment
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Cations, Divalent, Copper, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lead, Nickel, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Supply, X-Ray Diffraction, Zinc, Zeolites, Water Purification, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review