Cited by 13Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationHeavy metals in environment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

METALS REMOVAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR STORMWATER

Johnson, Pauline D., Clark, Shirley, Pitt, Robert, Durrans, S. Rocky, Urrutia, Matilde, Gill, Sarah, Kirby, Jason·2003·Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation

Abstract

This study, on innovative methods for the capture of metals from stormwater, focused on two major areas of investigation: media filters and swales. The test water for both the filters and the swales was a stormwater which was collected from a parking lot during wet weather events. The characterization of the stormwater showed that the most prevalent metals detected in the runoff were iron, zinc, copper and small amounts of particulate bound lead. Ranges of metals were within national ranges reported by other studies. In the filter studies twelve media were chosen for initial evaluation. Equilibrium and kinetic studies were completed on these media to assess their performance in capturing metals from urban runoff. The three best performing media: peat-sand mix, compost, and zeolite were then selected for in-depth study. The results of this investigation emphasize the importance of characterizing the stormwater before selecting a treatment media since the type and quantity of metals, pH, and other runoff characteristics can vary a great deal between sites. Additionally determining the range of metal concentrations of the runoff to be treated is crucial to selecting the best media, since the removal efficiencies of the media relative to each other changed with

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2175/193864703784344036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, P. D., Clark, S., Pitt, R., Durrans, S. R., Urrutia, M., Gill, S., & Kirby, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
2003
Issue
2
Pages
739-763
ISSN
1938-6478 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2185670357
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
Keywords
stormwater, metal removal, media filters, swales, urban runoff, iron, zinc, copper, lead, compost, zeolites, equilibrium analysis, parking lot runoff

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review