The DOI matches its Crossref record.
METALS REMOVAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR STORMWATER
Abstract
This study, on innovative methods for the capture of metals from stormwater, focused on two major areas of investigation: media filters and swales. The test water for both the filters and the swales was a stormwater which was collected from a parking lot during wet weather events. The characterization of the stormwater showed that the most prevalent metals detected in the runoff were iron, zinc, copper and small amounts of particulate bound lead. Ranges of metals were within national ranges reported by other studies. In the filter studies twelve media were chosen for initial evaluation. Equilibrium and kinetic studies were completed on these media to assess their performance in capturing metals from urban runoff. The three best performing media: peat-sand mix, compost, and zeolite were then selected for in-depth study. The results of this investigation emphasize the importance of characterizing the stormwater before selecting a treatment media since the type and quantity of metals, pH, and other runoff characteristics can vary a great deal between sites. Additionally determining the range of metal concentrations of the runoff to be treated is crucial to selecting the best media, since the removal efficiencies of the media relative to each other changed with
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Others may be removed through bioaccumulation through plant uptake that is depen dent upon plant density and type and hydraulic residence time (Johnson et al., 2003; Sun and Davis, 2007).”
From Review of emerging contaminants in green stormwater infrastructure: antibiotic resistance genes, microplastics, tire wear particles, PFAS, and temperature (2024) · cites this paper as Johnson et al., 2003
In the citing paper
“In addition, microplastics, tire wear particles, and ARGs can be removed through processes such as biotransformation, volatili zation, and chemo-transformation breaking down contaminants (John son et al., 2003; Koutnik et al., 2022b; Saifur and Gardner, 2023).”
From Review of emerging contaminants in green stormwater infrastructure: antibiotic resistance genes, microplastics, tire wear particles, PFAS, and temperature (2024) · cites this paper as Johnson et al., 2003
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bodus, B., O'Malley, K., Dieter, G., Gunawardana, C., & McDonald, W. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167195 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, P. D., Clark, S., Pitt, R., Durrans, S. R., Urrutia, M., Gill, S., & Kirby, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation
- Publisher
- Water Environment Federation
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 2003
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 739-763
- ISSN
- 1938-6478 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2185670357
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Keywords
- stormwater, metal removal, media filters, swales, urban runoff, iron, zinc, copper, lead, compost, zeolites, equilibrium analysis, parking lot runoff
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review