Lactic Acid Bacteria As Live Vaccines
Open accessAbstract
Mucosal routes for vaccine delivery offer several advantages over systemic inoculation from both immunological and practical points of view. The development of efficient mucosal vaccines therefore represents a top prority in modern vaccinology. One way to deliver protective antigens at the mucosal surfaces is to use live bacterial vectors. Until recently most of these were derived from attenuated pathogenic microorganisms. As an alternative to this strategy, non-pathogenic food grade bacteria such as lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are being tested for their efficacy as live antigen carriers. The LABVAC european research network is presently comparing the vaccine potential of Lactococcus lactis, Streptococcus gordonii and Lactobacillus spp. To date, it has been shown that systemic and mucosal antigen-specific immune responses can be elicited in mice through the nasal route using the three LAB systems under study. Data on successful oral and vaginal immunisations are also accumulating for L. lactis and S. gordonii, respectively. Moreover, the immune responses can be potentiated by co-expression of interleukins. Future areas of research include improvement of local immunisation efficiency, analysis of in vivo antigen production, unravelling of the Lactobacillus colonisation mechanisms and construction of biologically contained strains.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As a noncolonizing bacterium that is able to survive in the gastrointestinal tract, L. lactis constitutes an appropriate vehicle for the delivery of antigens in the gastrointestinal tract for mucosal immunization.
“As a noncolonizing bacterium that is nevertheless able to survive in the gastrointestinal tract, it constitutes an appropriate vehicle for the delivery of antigens in the gastrointestinal tract for mucosal immunization (4, 7, 25, 30, 37).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 193
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- In G. Pozzi and J.M. Wells (ed.), Gram-positive bacteria as vaccine vehicles for mucosal immunisation. Biotechnology Intelligence Unit. Landes, Austin, U.S.A.
- Dutot, P. 1996 Evaluation des lactobacilles comme vecteurs vivants de vaccination. PhD thesis, Université Louis Pasteur de Strasbourg, France.
- Guzman, C.A., S. Weiss, and T. Chakraborty. 1997. Listeria monocytogenes -A promising vaccine carrier to evoke cellular immune reponses, p. 145-173. In G. Pozzi and J.M. Wells (ed.) Gram-positive bacteria as vaccine vehicles for mucosal immunisation. Biotechnology Intelligence Unit. Landes, Austin, U.S.A. 13. Havenaar, R., B. Ten Brink, and J.H.J. Huis in't Veld. 1992. Selection of strains for probiotic use. p. 209- 224.
- In R. Fuller (ed.), Probiotics, the scientific basis. Chapmann and Hall, London, UK.
- Medaglini, D., G. Pozzi, T.P. King, and V.A. Fischetti. 1995. Mucosal and systemic immune responses to a recombinant protein expressed on the surface of the oral commensal bacterium Streptococcus gordonii after oral colonisation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92: 6868-6872.
- In M.J. Gasson and W.M. de Vos (ed.), Genetics and Biotechnology of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow, Scotland.
- Pozzi, G., M.R. Oggioni, and D. Medaglini. 1997. Recombinant Streptococcus gordonii as a live vehicle for vaccine antigens, p. 35-60. In G. Pozzi and J.M. Wells (ed.), Gram-positive bacteria as vaccine vehicles for mucosal immunation. Biotechnology Intelligence Unit. Landes, Austin, U.S.A. 36. Rescigno, M., C. Citterio, M. Théry, M. Rittig, D. Medaglini, G. Pozzi, S. Amigorena, and P. Ricciardi- Castagnoli. 1998. Bacteria-induced neo-biosynthesis, stabilisation, and surface expression of functional class I molecules in mouse dendritic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 5229-5234.
- In G. Pozzi and J.M. Wells (ed.), Gram-positive bacteria as vaccine vehicles for mucosal immunisation. Biotechnology Intelligence Unit. Landes, Austin, U.S.A. 39. Salminen, S., E. Isolauri, and E. Salminen. 1996. Clinical uses of probiotics for stabilising the gut mucosal barrier: successful strains and future challenges. Anton. van Leeuwen. 70: 347-358.
- Stahl, S., P. Samuelson, M. Hansson, C. Andréoni, L. Goetsch, C. Libon, S. Liljeqvist, E. Gunneriusson, H. Binz, T. Ngoc Nguyen, and M. Uhlén. 1997. Development of non-pathogenic staphylococci as vaccine delivery vehicles, p. 61-81. In G. Pozzi and J.M. Wells (ed.), Gram-positive bacteria as vaccine vehicles for mucosal immunisation. Biotechnology Intelligence Unit. Landes, Austin, U.S.A. 41. Steidler, L., J.M. Wells, J. Raeymaekers, J. Vandekerckhove, W. Fiers, and E. Remaut. 1995. Secretion of biologically active murine interleukin-2 by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 1627-1629.
- Wells, J.M., P.M. Norton., and R.W.F. Le Page. 1995. Progress in the development of mucosal vaccines based on Lactococcus lactis. Int. Dairy Journal 5: 1071- 1079.
- Wells, J.M. and G. Pozzi. 1997. An overview of gram- positive bacteria as vaccine vehicles for mucosal immunisation, p. 1-8. In G. Pozzi and J.M. Wells (ed.), Gram-positive bacteria as vaccine vehicles for mucosal immunisation. Biotechnology Intelligence Unit. Landes, Austin, U.S.A. 48. Wold, A.E., U.I.H. Dahlgren, L.A .Hanson, I. Mattsby- Baltzer, and T. Midvedt. 1989. Difference between bacterial and food antigens in mucosal immunogenicity. Infect. Immun. 57: 2666-2673.
- Authors
- Mercenier, A., Müller‐Alouf, H., & Grangette, C.
- Affiliations
- Institut Pasteur de Lille (FR)
- Venue
- Current Issues in Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-25
- ISSN
- 1467-3037 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1846000432
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 31.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Current Issues in Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Cancer Research and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Keywords
- lactic acid bacteria, live attenuated vaccine, mucosal immunization, Lactococcus lactis, Streptococcus gordonii, Lactobacillus, oral immunization, antigen delivery, bacterial colonization
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antibody Formation, Antigens, Surface, Bacterial Adhesion, Europe, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Immunoglobulin A, Secretory, International Cooperation, Lactobacillus, Mucous Membrane, Peptide Fragments, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Safety, Streptococcus, Lactococcus lactis, Tetanus Toxin, Vaccination, Vaccines, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review