The effect of microteaching combined with the BOPPPS model on dental materials education for predoctoral dental students
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of microteaching combined with the BOPPPS method (bridge-in, learning objective, pretest, participatory learning, posttest, and summary) on a dental materials course for predoctoral dental students. Participants were 105 fourth-year students in a dental school in China in 2016 and 2017. The control group consisted of 51 students who received conventional teaching, while the experimental group consisted of 54 students who received dental materials education from teachers using microteaching combined with the BOPPPS method. Teaching effectiveness was evaluated by all students after each class, and examination scores for the two groups were compared. The results showed that the evaluations of teacher performance in the experimental group were superior to those in the control group in two areas: effectiveness of communication and clear interpretation of abstract ideas and theories. The evaluation scores for teaching effectiveness were significantly better for the experimental group than for the control group (students were encouraged to participate in class discussion, instructor stimulated interest in the course subject, instructor encouraged students to think for themselves, students learned and understood the subject materials in the course). In addition, the experimental group had significantly higher examination scores than the control group. These results suggest that microteaching based on the BOPPPS model could stimulate…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The BOPPPS teaching model was initially developed to improve teaching effectiveness and instructor skills for teacher training.
“The BOPPPS teaching model, also known as the guided learning interactive efficiency-enhancing teaching method, was initially developed to improve teaching effectiveness and instructor skills for teacher training (13).”
From The effectiveness of an integrated CBL and BOPPPS model in neurological nursing clinical teaching: a comparative study (2026) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qian, P., Su, J., & Xu, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1789025
- Authors
- Yang, Y., You, J., Wu, J., Hu, C., & Shao, L.
- Affiliations
- Nanfang Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Shao, Longquan
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 567-574
- ISSN
- 0022-0337 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7837
- OpenAlex
- W2921548452
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Dental Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- microteaching, BOPPPS model, predoctoral dental students, teaching effectiveness, student evaluation of teaching, test scores, active learning, student engagement
- MeSH terms
- China, Education, Dental, Education, Dental, Graduate, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Male, Teaching, Teaching Materials, Models, Educational, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review