Rechtvaardiging en eschatologie in de brieven aan de Thessalonicenzen
Open accessAbstract
Protestantism primarily associates justification with the linguistic field of Romans and Galatians. This article explores perspectives on justification developed from 1-2 Thessalonians and the following themes: God’s future coming as Judge, the imitation of Christ, God’s call to holiness, and the faithful as a crown of honor for Christ. The connections between these themes and eschatology place the doctrine of justification found in 1-2 Thessalonians in a process of being included in the kingdom of God.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
- Authors
- Hausoul, R. R.
- Corresponding author
- Hausoul, R.R.
- ORCID
- Hausoul, R.R.
- Venue
- Theologia Reformata
- Publisher
- University of Groningen Press
- Published
- 2022-09-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 276-289
- ISSN
- 0040-5612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4294682337
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Theologia Reformata (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
- Keywords
- justification, eschatology, Pauline epistles, imitation of Christ, holiness, final judgment, Kingdom of God, Protestant theology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
