The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tantangan globalisasi, peran negara, dan implikasinya terhadap aktualisasi nilai-nilai ideologi negara
Open accessAbstract
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh globalisasi, peran negara, dan implikasinya terhadap aktualisasi nilai-nilai ideologi negara bagi Warga Negara Indonesia. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam menjawab permasalahan adalah dengan studi literatur, observasi, dan wawancara. Dari hasil data ditemukan bahwa terdapat nilai-nilai globalisasi yang mempengaruhi pola pikir, sikap, dan perilaku sebagian warga negara yang didukung dengan konsistensi, ketegasan, dan penguatan peran pemerintah dalam merawat nilai-nilai kebersamaan. Selain itu juga berimplikasi untuk meredam eskalasi dan kegiatan yang menjurus pada perilaku yang menonjolkan sentiment primordial serta berimplikasi memantapkan persepsi warga negara tentang pentingnya ideologi negara, walaupun tidak langsung mengakselerasi masyarakat mengaktualisasikan nilai-nilai ideology negara secara signifikan.-----This article aims to analyze the effect of globalization, the role of the state, and its implications for the actualization of state ideology values for Indonesian citizens. The approach used in answering problems is through literature study, observation, and interview. From the results of the data, it found that there are values of globalization that affect the mindset, attitudes, and behavior of some citizens supported by consistency, decisiveness, and strengthening the role of government in caring for the values of togetherness. It also has implications to reduce escalation and activities that lead to behaviors that highlight primordial sentiments and has implications for strengthening citizens' perceptions about the importance of state ideology. However, it does not directly accelerate the community to actualize state ideology values significantly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Agus, A. A. (2016). Relevansi Pancasila sebagai ideologi terbuka di era reformasi. Jurnal Office, 2(2), 229- 238. http://ojs.unm.ac.id/jo/article/download/2958/1608
- Budiyono. (2017). Memperkokoh ideologi negara Pancasila melalui bela negara. Citizenship: Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.25273/citizenship.v5i1.1148 · DOI
- Bunga, M., Maroa, M. D., Arief, A., & Djanggih, H. (2019). Urgensi peran serta masyarakat dalam upaya pencegahan dan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi. Law Reform, 15(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23356 · DOI
- Hastangka, H., Armawi, A., & Kaelan. (2019). Dampak sosialisasi empat pilar MPR RI terhadap Pendidikan Pancasila di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 16(2), 98-110.
- Juneman, Meinarno, E. A., & Rahardjo, W. (2012). Symbolic meaning of money, self-esteem, and identification with Pancasila values. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 106-115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.099 · DOI
- Kaelan. (2004). Pendidikan Pancasila (8th ed.). Paradigma.
- Kemala, A. (2018). Globalisasi industri hiburan Jepang dan Korea: Pengaruh terhadap perspektif publik antar negara. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 20(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v20i2.336 · DOI
- Kim, B. J., Kavanaugh, A. L., & Hult, K. M. (2011). Civic engagement and internet use in local governance: hierarchial linear models for understanding the role of local community groups. Administration & Society, 43(7), 807-835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711413873 · DOI
- Kiswanto, E. (2005). Negara kesejahteraan (welfare state): Mengembalikan peran negara dalam pembangunan kesejahteraan sosial di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Administrasi Publik, 9(2), 91-102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.8320 · DOI
- Li, X., & Soobaroyen, T. (2020). Accounting, Ideological and Political Work and Chinese multinational operations: A neo-Gramscian perspective. Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102160 · DOI
- Mangunsong, N., & Fitria, V. (2019). Pancasila dan toleransi pada tradisi keagamaan masyarakat Yogyakarta. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 16(1), 89-97.
- Mir, U. R., Hassan, S. M., & Qadri, M. M. (2014). Understanding globalization and its future: An analysis. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 34(2), 607-624.
- Muryanti. (2018). Tindakan korupsi sebagai tindakan imoral dalam perspektif fungsional (kajian film korupsi dan kita: rumah perkara). Jurnal Komunikasi Profetik, 11(2), 32-45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v11i2.1317 · DOI
- Novenanto, A. (2016). Membangun bencana: Tinjauan kritis atas peran negara dalam kasus Lapindo. Masyarakat; Jurnal Sosiologi, 20(2), 159-192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7454/mjs.v20i2.4263 · DOI
- Prabowo, M. S. (2015). Pengaruh globalisasi ekonomi dan hukum ekonomi internasional dalam pembangunan hukum ekonomi di Indonesia. Jurnal Litigasi, 16(1), 2741-2780. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v16i1.52 · DOI
- Pratiwi, A. E., Triyono, S., Rezkiyanto, I., Asad, A. S., & Khollimah, D. A. (2018). Eksistensi masyarakat adat di tengah globalisasi. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 15(2), 95-102.
- Sanjaya, A. R. (2018). Petisi Indonesia untuk Dunia: Potret Globalisasi Gerakan Sosial Digital. Jurnal Komunikasi, 10(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/jk.v10i1.520 · DOI
- Sitorus, J. H. E. (2016). Pancasila-based social responsibility accounting. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 700-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.054 · DOI
- Wells, P., & Wang, L. (2017). Borderless world 2.0. Evs30 Symposium, December, 1-10.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aprima, Agustini, K., & Sudatha, I. G. W. (2026) · Journal of Education Technology · doi:10.23887/jet.v10i01.65702
Metadata
- Authors
- Silitonga, T. B.
- Affiliations
- Indonesia Defense University (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Silitonga, Tatar Bonar
- Venue
- Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan
- Publisher
- Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
- Published
- 2020-05-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-28
- ISSN
- 1829-5789 (ISSN-L)
- 2541-1918
- OpenAlex
- W3022230689
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- id
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Jurnal Civics Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Pancasila Values in Education
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Globalization and Cultural Identity
- Keywords
- globalization, role of the state, state ideology, Indonesian citizens, togetherness, citizenship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
