CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Vocational and Entrepreneurial EducationVocational Education and TrainingEducational Management and Quality

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of Vocational Education Management in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Society 5.0 at SMKN 2 Pengasih

Open access
Hastutiningsih, Arum Dwi, Sugiyono, Sugiyono, Suyanto, Suyanto, Ashyrnepesov, Vezir·2024·Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan
DOI 10.21831/jptk.v30i1.70013
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The era of industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0 has brought significant changes in various aspects of life, including in the world of vocational education. Vocational education is becoming increasingly important in this era because the business world and the industrial world (DUDI) increasingly need a skilled workforce and have skills that are relevant to industry needs. This study aims to find out how far the management of vocational education is in the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Society 5.0, especially at SMK N 2 Pengasih. The research was conducted using qualitative methods using interviews as a data collection technique. The results of the research show that the management of vocational education in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0 at SMKN 2 Pengasih has been going quite well. However, there is still a need for improvement considering that there are still several obstacles in its implementation.Keywords: Industrial Revolution 4.0, Society 5.0, Vocational Education

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21831/jptk.v30i1.70013

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Budiharto, Triyono, & Suparman. (2019). Pengaruh Teknologi Pendidikan Pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sejarah, Sosial, Budaya Dan Kependidikan, 6(2), 2019: 96- 114 I, 6(2), 96-114.
  2. Doringin, F., Tarigan, N. M., & Prihanto, J. N. (2020). Eksistensi Pendidikan Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Dan Rekayasa (JTIR), 1(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.53091/jtir.v1i1.17 · DOI
  3. Hayashi, H., Sasajima, H., Takayanagi, Y., & Kanamaru, H. (2017). International standardization for smarter society in the field of measurement, control and automation. 2017 56th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE), 263-266. https://doi.org/10.23919/SICE.2017.8105723 · DOI
  4. Irwanto, I. (2020). Model pembelajaran pendidikan vokasional yang efektif di era revolusi industri 4.0. Taman Vokasi, 8(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.30738/jtv.v8i1.7265 · DOI
  5. Ismaya, B., Perdana, I., Arifin, A., Fadjarajani, S., Anantadjaya, S. P., & Muhammadiah, M. (2021). Merdeka Belajar in the Point of View of Learning Technology in the Era of 4.0 and Society 5.0. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 1777-1785. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.556 · DOI
  6. Kuper, H. (2020). Industry 4.0: changes in work organization and qualification requirements- challenges for academic and vocational education. Entrepreneurship Education, 3(2), 119- 131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-020-00029-1 · DOI
  7. Lince, L. (2022). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar pada Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Pusat Keunggulan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, Vol.30 No.1, May 2024, pp. 51-61
  8. Tarbiyah Dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIM Sinjai, 1(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.47435/sentikjar.v1i0.829 · DOI
  9. Misbah, Z., Gulikers, J., Dharma, S., & Mulder, M. (2020). Evaluating competence-based vocational education in Indonesia. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 72(4), 488-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2019.1635634 · DOI
  10. Na'immatur Rokhmah, & Saputra, J. (2019). Teknologi yang Relevan Menjadi Bagian Integral dari Kurikulum. Himatika, 1(1937), 1-7.
  11. Nastiti, F. E., Ni'mal 'abdu, A. R., & Kajian, J. (2022). Kesiapan Pendidikan Indonesia Menghadapi era society 5.0. Edcomtech, 5(1), 61-66.
  12. Özdemir, V., & Hekim, N. (2018). Birth of Industry 5.0: Making Sense of Big Data with Artificial Intelligence, "The Internet of Things" and Next-Generation Technology Policy. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 22(1), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2017.0194 · DOI
  13. Raharjo, S. B. (2012). Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 2(16), 246-267.
  14. Rahmawati, M., Ruslan, A., & Bandarsyah, D. (2021). The Era of Society 5.0 as the unification of humans and technology: A literature review on materialism and existentialism. Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika, 16(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.20473/jsd.v16i2.2021.151-162 · DOI
  15. Skobelev, Borovik, P. and, & Sergey. (2021). On The Way from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: from Digital Manufacturing to Digital Society. International Scientific Journal "Industry 4.0," 2, 307-311.
  16. Utomo, W. (2021). Paradigma Pendidikan Vokasi: Tantangan, Harapan Dan Kenyataan INFO. Almufi Journal of Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation Education, 1(2), 65-72.
  17. Verawadina, U., Jalinus, N., & Asnur, L. (2019). Mengkaji Kurikulum di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Bagi Pendidikan Vokasi. 17(2), 228-239.
  18. Wardina, U. V., Jalinus, N., & Asnur, L. (2019). Kurikulum Pendidikan Vokasi Pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan, 20(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v20i1.843.2019 · DOI
  19. Winangun, K. (2017). Pendidikan Vokasi Sebagai Pondasi Bangsa Menghadapi Globalisasi. Taman Vokasi, 5(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.30738/jtvok.v5i1.1493 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hastutiningsih, A. D., Sugiyono, S., Suyanto, S., & Ashyrnepesov, V.
Affiliations
Yogyakarta State University (ID)
ORCID
Venue
Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Published
2024-05-17
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
51-61
ISSN
  • 0854-4735 (ISSN-L)
  • 2477-2410
DOI
10.21831/jptk.v30i1.70013
OpenAlex
W4399926247
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational and Entrepreneurial Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Vocational Education and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Management and Quality
Keywords
vocational education management, Fourth Industrial Revolution, Society 5.0, vocational high school, skilled workers, industry needs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review