13. Positive L2 Self: Linking Positive Psychology with L2 Motivation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Following the emergence and rapid flowering of positive psychology in general education, an explicit positive renaissance happened in the domain of language education.
“However, it was not until rather recently that, following the emergence and rapid flowering of positive psychology in general education, an explicit positive renaissance happened in the domain of language education (MacIntyre and Gregersen, 2012; Lake, 2013).”
From Researching and Practicing Positive Psychology in Second/Foreign Language Learning and Teaching: The Past, Current Status and Future Directions (2021) · cites this paper as Lake, 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 121
- Authors
- Lake, J.
- Corresponding author
- Lake, J.
- ORCID
- Lake, J.
- Venue
- Language Learning Motivation in Japan
- Publisher
- Multilingual Matters
- Published
- 2013-12-31
- Pages
- 225-244
- OpenAlex
- W2801885291
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Multilingual Matters eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- second language motivation, positive psychology, self-concept, learner identity, language learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review