Cited by 59EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Stress and CopingCommunication in Education and Healthcare

10. Anxious Language Learners Can Change Their Minds: Ideas and Strategies from Traditional Psychology and Positive Psychology

Oxford, Rebecca L.·2017·New Insights into Language Anxiety

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21832/9781783097722-011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oxford, R. L.
Corresponding author
Oxford, Rebecca L.
Venue
New Insights into Language Anxiety
Published
2017-12-31
Pages
177-197
OpenAlex
W2901460545
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
14.32
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multilingual Matters eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Channel View Publications eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
student anxiety, positive psychology, cognitive change, language learning motivation, anxiety reduction strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review