Cited by 668EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningHuman Behavior and MotivationMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

11. A Person-in-Context Relational View of Emergent Motivation, Self and Identity

Open access
Ushioda, Ema·2009·Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self

Abstract

No description provided

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21832/9781847691293-012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MotS are complex and inseparable from the relations of actual people in contexts of differing constraints and affordances.

    “both the studies above, for example, serve to highlight the complexity of MotS and their inseparability from the relations of actual people in contexts of differing constraints and affordances.”

    From The motivational dimension of language teaching (2017) · cites this paper as Ushioda 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ushioda, E.
Corresponding author
Ushioda, Ema
Venue
Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self
Published
2009-12-31
Pages
215-228
OpenAlex
W1486761075
Cited by
668
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 22
FWCI
82.29
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Multilingual Matters eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • University of Warwick (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
self, identity, relational view

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review