Cited by 91COVID-19 and healthcare impactsBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction

Delay in breast cancer treatments during the first COVID-19 lockdown. A multicentric analysis of 432 patients

Open access
VANNI, GIANLUCA, TAZZIOLI, GIOVANNI, PELLICCIARO, MARCO, MATERAZZO, MARCO, PAOLO, ORSARIA, CATTADORI, FRANCESCA, COMBI, FRANCESCA, PAPI, SIMONA +15 more·2020·Anticancer Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Extraordinary restrictions aimed to limit Sars-CoV-2 spreading; they imposed a total reorganization of the health-system. Oncological treatments experienced a significant slowdown. The aim of our multicentric retrospective study was to evaluate screening suspension and surgical treatment delay during COVID-19 and the impact on breast cancer presentation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent breast surgery from March 11, 2020 to May 30, 2020 were evaluated and considered as the Lockdown group. These patients were compared with similar patients of the previous year, the Pre-Lockdown group. RESULTS: A total of 432 patients were evaluated; n=223 and n=209 in the Lockdown and Pre-lockdown-groups, respectively. At univariate analysis, waiting times, lymph-nodes involvement and cancer grading, showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified waiting-time on list (OR=1.07) as a statistically significant predictive factor of lymph node involvement. CONCLUSION: Although we did not observe a clinically evident difference in breast cancer presentation, we reported an increase in lymph node involvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21873/anticanres.14741

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption to the cancer care system, including a shift to virtual appointments, alternative treatment offerings, postponement of surveillance scans and surgeries, and diminished supportive care and survivorship services.

    “In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption to the cancer care system, including a shift to virtual appointments, alternative treatment offerings, postponement of surveillance scans and surgeries, and diminished supportive care and survivorship services [6,7].”

    From The Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults with Cancer: A Rapid Review (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Discussion describes disrupted oncology services and the temporary suspension of routine preventive activities; it also reports longer waits for breast cancer surgery during lockdown. The paper does not establish a shift to virtual appointments, alternative treatment offerings, postponed surveillance scans, or diminished supportive care and survivorship services. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 91

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Senie RT, Lesser M, Kinne DW and Rosen PP: Method of tumor detection influences disease-free survival of women with breast carcinoma. Cancer 73(6): 1666-1672, 1994. PMID: 8156494. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940315)73:6<1666::aid-cncr28207306 19>3.0.co;2-e 18 · DOI

Authors
VANNI, G., TAZZIOLI, G., PELLICCIARO, M., MATERAZZO, M., PAOLO, O., CATTADORI, F., COMBI, F., PAPI, S., PISTOLESE, C. A., COTESTA, M., SANTORI, F., CASPI, J., CHIARAVALLOTI, A., MUSCOLI, S., LOMBARDO, V., GRASSO, A., CAGGIATI, L., RASELLI, R., PALLI, D., ALTOMARE, V., D’ANGELILLO, R. M., PALOMBI, L., & BUONOMO, O. C.
Affiliations
  • Policlinico Tor Vergata (IT)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital (IT)
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo (IT)
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
Venue
Anticancer Research
Published
2020-12
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
7119-7125
ISSN
  • 0250-7005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1791-7530
OpenAlex
W3112690872
Cited by
91
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 18
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anticancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Basilicata) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Keywords
breast cancer, COVID-19 lockdown, treatment delay, breast surgery, waiting time, lymph node involvement, cancer grading, health care reform, SARS-CoV-2
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Axilla, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Lymph Nodes, Lymphatic Metastasis, Mastectomy, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review