Cited by 5Connexins and lens biologyAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insulin Docking Within the Open Hemichannel of Connexin 43 May Reduce Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Type 2 diabetes (T2D), characterized by hyperinsulinemia, protects motor neurons against amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Type 1 diabetes and a total lack of insulin are associated with increased risk of ALS. Connexin 43 (Cx43), an astrocyte protein, operates as an open pore via which toxic substances from the astrocytes reach motor neurons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the current study, we performed molecular docking of insulin with monomeric Cx31, monomeric Cx43, and hexameric Cx31 to assess whether insulin might affect the pore. Hexameric Cx31 and hexameric Cx43 are transmembrane hemichannels composed of 6 subunits; they bind together to form gap junction intercellular channels. We used the program AutoDock Vina Extended for the molecular docking study. RESULTS: Cx31 shares amino acid and structural similarity to Cx43, and insulin docks to the same position at the N-terminal domain of monomeric Cx31 and monomeric Cx43. Insulin docks within the open hemichannel of hexameric Cx31, potentially blocking it. Molecular dynamics simulation shows that the block is highly stable and may be responsible for the protective effect of T2D on ALS. CONCLUSION: Insulin, especially intranasal insulin, might be a treatment for ALS. An insulin secretogogue such as oral sulfonylurea or meglitinide might also be of value.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21873/invivo.13112

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Metadata

Authors
LEHRER, S., & RHEINSTEIN, P. H.
Corresponding author
LEHRER, STEVEN
Venue
In Vivo
Published
2023
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
539-547
ISSN
  • 0258-851X (ISSN-L)
  • 1791-7549
OpenAlex
W4323347484
Cited by
5
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • In Vivo (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1s10od026880-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
insulin, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, connexin 43, connexin 31, gap junctions, type 2 diabetes, motor neuron protection, intranasal insulin, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, insulin secretagogues
MeSH terms
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Insulin, Connexin 43, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review