The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Influence of English Language and Spanish Language Captions on Foreign Language Listening/Reading Comprehension
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of using Spanish captions, English captions, or no captions with a Spanish language soundtrack on intermediate university-level Spanish as a Foreign Language students' listening/reading comprehension. A total of 213 intermediate (fourth semester) students participated as intact groups in the study. The passage material consisted of a DVD episode (seven minutes) presenting information concerning preparation for the Apollo 13 NASA space exploration mission. The students viewed only one of three passage treatment conditions: Spanish captions, English captions, or no captions. The Spanish language dependent measure consisted of a 20-item multiple-choice listening comprehension test. The statistically significant results revealed that the English captions group performed at a considerably higher level than the Spanish captions group which in turn performed at a substantially higher level than the no captions group on the listening test. The article concludes with a discussion of the pedagogical implications of using multilingual captions in a variety of ways to enhance second language listening and reading comprehension.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The multiple-choice test format seemed to be particularly appropriate in this study, as the low-and mid-level students clearly lacked highly developed English language writing ability at this point in their study of the target language (Markham & Peter, 2003).”
From The effects of captions on L2 learners’ comprehension of vlogs (2021) · cites this paper as Markham & Peter, 2003
In the citing paper
“These results do not support Markham and Peter's (2003) claim that the influence of pictorial support for listening comprehension could be ruled out.”
From The effects of captions on L2 learners’ comprehension of vlogs (2021) · cites this paper as Markham and Peter's (2003)
Citations
Cites
Neuman, S. B., & Koskinen, P. (1992) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.2307/747835 · Cited by 362
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Boyd J., 1972, American Annals of the Deaf, 117, 34
- Goldman M., 1988, Journal of Reading, 31, 458
- 10.1080/19388078509557842 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00469.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2190/JKC2-LE5D-36BC-809F · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1999.tb01344.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02299476 · DOI
- 10.2190/RG06-LYWB-216Y-R27G · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02083.x · DOI
- Educational Testing Service (ETS), 1998, TOEIC Research Summary
- Educational Testing Service (ETS), 2001, 2001–02 Edition of the TOEFL Test and Score Data Summary
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis
Montero Perez, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Desmet, P. (2013) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.07.013 · Cited by 347
Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition
Syodorenko, T. (2010) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44214 · Cited by 250
The effects of captions on L2 learners’ comprehension of vlogs
Aldukhayel, D. (2021) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/73439 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Markham, P., & Peter, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas, Lawrence
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Technology Systems
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-341
- ISSN
- 0047-2395
- 1541-3810
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review