Administrative Work Consumes One-Sixth of U.S. Physicians' Working Hours and Lowers their Career Satisfaction
Abstract
Doctors often complain about the burden of administrative work, but few studies have quantified how much time clinicians devote to administrative tasks. We quantified the time U.S. physicians spent on administrative tasks, and its relationship to their career satisfaction, based on a nationally representative survey of 4,720 U.S. physicians working 20 or more hours per week in direct patient care. The average doctor spent 8.7 hours per week (16.6% of working hours) on administration. Psychiatrists spent the highest proportion of their time on administration (20.3%), followed by internists (17.3%) and family/general practitioners (17.3%). Pediatricians spent the least amount of time, 6.7 hours per week or 14.1 percent of professional time. Doctors in large practices, those in practices owned by a hospital, and those with financial incentives to reduce services spent more time on administration. More extensive use of electronic medical records was associated with a greater administrative burden. Doctors spending more time on administration had lower career satisfaction, even after controlling for income and other factors. Current trends in U.S. health policy--a shift to employment in large practices, the implementation of electronic medical records, and the increasing prevalence of financial risk sharing--are likely to increase doctors' paperwork burdens and may decrease their career satisfaction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
US physicians devote one-sixth of their working hours (8.7 hours per week) to administration, which lowers career satisfaction.
“As reported by Woolhandler et al. in 2014, US physicians devote one-sixth of their working hours, spending 8.7 hours per week, on administration which eventually lowers career satisfaction.20”
Time spent on administration tasks correlates with low career satisfaction.
“Studies show that they spend at least as much time documenting as with direct patient care [49] and that the time spent on administration tasks correlates with low career satisfaction [50].”
From Prevention of burnout syndrome in physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [50]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 7 · Cited by 209
- Authors
- Woolhandler, S., & Himmelstein, D. U.
- Corresponding author
- Himmelstein, David U.
- Venue
- International Journal of Health Services
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 635-642
- ISSN
- 0020-7314 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-4469
- OpenAlex
- W1986908450
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 14.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Health Services (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Keywords
- administrative burden, physician time use, career satisfaction, physician workload, electronic health records, financial risk sharing, specialty differences, health policy
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Income, Job Satisfaction, Male, Medicine, Physicians, Professional Practice, Time Factors, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review