Cited by 209Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutElectronic Health Records SystemsDiversity and Career in Medicine

Administrative Work Consumes One-Sixth of U.S. Physicians' Working Hours and Lowers their Career Satisfaction

Woolhandler, Steffie, Himmelstein, David U.·2014·International Journal of Health Services

Abstract

Doctors often complain about the burden of administrative work, but few studies have quantified how much time clinicians devote to administrative tasks. We quantified the time U.S. physicians spent on administrative tasks, and its relationship to their career satisfaction, based on a nationally representative survey of 4,720 U.S. physicians working 20 or more hours per week in direct patient care. The average doctor spent 8.7 hours per week (16.6% of working hours) on administration. Psychiatrists spent the highest proportion of their time on administration (20.3%), followed by internists (17.3%) and family/general practitioners (17.3%). Pediatricians spent the least amount of time, 6.7 hours per week or 14.1 percent of professional time. Doctors in large practices, those in practices owned by a hospital, and those with financial incentives to reduce services spent more time on administration. More extensive use of electronic medical records was associated with a greater administrative burden. Doctors spending more time on administration had lower career satisfaction, even after controlling for income and other factors. Current trends in U.S. health policy--a shift to employment in large practices, the implementation of electronic medical records, and the increasing prevalence of financial risk sharing--are likely to increase doctors' paperwork burdens and may decrease their career satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/hs.44.4.a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 7 · Cited by 209

Authors
Woolhandler, S., & Himmelstein, D. U.
Corresponding author
Himmelstein, David U.
Venue
International Journal of Health Services
Published
2014-10
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
635-642
ISSN
  • 0020-7314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-4469
OpenAlex
W1986908450
Cited by
209
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2
FWCI
14.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Health Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
administrative burden, physician time use, career satisfaction, physician workload, electronic health records, financial risk sharing, specialty differences, health policy
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Income, Job Satisfaction, Male, Medicine, Physicians, Professional Practice, Time Factors, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review