Different factors affect different aspects of dream recall.
Abstract
Dream recall is naturally a prerequisite for eliciting dream content. Therefore it is of importance to study factors (e.g., personality traits) that might affect dream recall because these factors might bias the content analytic findings in the field of dream research. The present findings indicate that different aspects of dream recall (dream recall frequency, dream recall detail, long-term dream memory) are affected by different factors or at least in different magnitudes by the same factors (e.g., imagination). Whether these variables have a confounding effect on dream content analytic findings using different sampling methods (most recent dreams, diary dreams, and laboratory dreams) is poorly understood, but the present results clearly indicate that there is a need for systematic research in this area in order to increase the representativeness of content analytic findings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies of individuals who experience frequent arousals during sleep due to insomnia or sleep apnea show increased dream recall frequency.
“Studies of individuals who experience frequent arousals during sleep, due for example to insomnia or sleep apnea, show increased dream recall frequency (DRF; Schredl, 1999, 2009, 2010; Schredl et al., 1999).”
From Increased Awakenings From Non-rapid Eye Movement Sleep Explain Differences in Dream Recall Frequency in Healthy Individuals (2019) · cites this paper as Schredl, 2009
Cites
Domhoff, G. W. (1996) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0298-6 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Goodenough, D. R., Shapiro, A., Holden, M., & Steinschriber, L. (1959) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040532 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
SCHREDL, M. (1995) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1995.tb01420.x · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Wyk, M., Solms, M., & Lipinska, G. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00370 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Literature shows that these factors have an independent relationship with sleep and/or dreaming (Lee, 1998; Blackman, 2000; Irwin et al., 2000; Nielsen and Stenstrom, 2005; Schredl, 2009; Pagel, 2010; Schredl et al., 2013; Skancke et al., 2014).”
Background
- Authors
- Schredl, M.
- Affiliations
- Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schredl, Michael
- ORCID
- Schredl, Michael
- Venue
- Imagination, Cognition and Personality
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 349-359
- ISSN
- 0276-2366 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-4477
- OpenAlex
- W1997526651
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Imagination Cognition and Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- dream recall, dream recall frequency, personality traits, imagination, dream content analysis, sampling methods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review