Attachment and severity of grief: The mediating role of negative appraisal and inflexible coping
Open accessAbstract
According to the Dual Process Model of coping with bereavement (DPM; Stroebe & Schut, 1999), adjustment to bereavement involves a flexible oscillation between two types of coping strategies: loss-oriented (LO) and restoration-oriented (RO). This model postulates that extremely anxious or avoidant attachment disturbs the oscillation process by focusing more on one type of strategy, either LO or RO. The present study examined this assumption. We recruited 321 bereaved individuals who had lost a romantic partner. Our results showed that less negative appraisal of bereavement-related stressors, as well as higher use of RO strategies, mediated the link between attachment avoidance and low severity of grief reactions. However, the DPM variables were not found to mediate the link between attachment anxiety and elevated grief reactions. We discuss how these results provide an empirical basis of the DPM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Delespaux et al. (2013) reported that using more loss- versus restoration-oriented coping showed a large positive association with complicated grief symptoms.
“and Delespaux et al. (2013) reported that using more lossversus restoration-oriented coping showed a large positive association with CG symptoms.”
From Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Delespaux et al. (2013)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Delespaux, E., Ryckebosch-Dayez, A.-S., Heeren, A., & Zech, E.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Delespaux, Emily
- Venue
- OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 269-289
- ISSN
- 0030-2228 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-3764
- OpenAlex
- W2058510885
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- grief severity, attachment, attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety, negative appraisals, bereavement, mediation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Defense Mechanisms, Female, France, Grief, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Object Attachment, Social Adjustment, Social Support, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review