Improved mortality among U.S. blacks, 1968-1978: The role of antiracist struggle
Abstract
A marked improvement in health status for black adults took place over the last decade in the United States. Life expectancy for black men increased 4.6 years between 1968 and 1978, while for black women the increase was 5.7 years. Death rates for the age group 35-74 decreased approximately 25 percent for blacks over the same period. The largest contribution to this improvement was made by cardiovascular diseases (coronary heart disease and stroke). Although similar improvement was observed in the white population, on both a percentage and absolute basis the change was greater for blacks. For the first time in the U.S., important progress was made in the effort to narrow the gap in mortality rates between black and white adults. Hypertension detection and control appears to have played the key role in this positive public health trend. The community-based demand for greater access to medical care, which emerged from the social struggle of the 1960s, also can be accorded a major social role. The current policies of the Reagan Administration pose a serious threat to these antiracist programs, as well as to the effort to close the gap in black-white mortality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Between 1968 and 1978, both black males and females aged 35-74 had larger absolute and relative declines in mortality than their white counterparts, with mortality declines larger for black women than black men.
“between 1968 and 1978, both black males and females, aged 35-74, had larger absolute and relative declines in mortality than their white counterparts, with the mortality declines being larger for black women than black men [33].”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [33]
Civil rights policies are an example of a large-scale economic initiative that led to improved health for blacks and reduced black-white disparities in health.
“Civil rights policies are an example of a large-scale economic initiative that led to improved health for blacks and reduced black-white disparities in health.”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Cooper, R., Steinhauer, M., Schatzkin, A., & Miller, W.
- Venue
- International Journal of Health Services
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1981-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 511-522
- ISSN
- 0020-7314 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-4469
- OpenAlex
- W2156226440
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Health Services (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
- Keywords
- black-white mortality gap, racial disparities in health, life expectancy, cardiovascular mortality, coronary artery disease, stroke, health care access, public health trends, African American health
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Black or African American, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Coronary Disease, Female, Health, Health Status, Humans, Hypertension, Life Expectancy, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Race Relations, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review