Cited by 38Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementWildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation

Natal Den Selection by Florida Panthers

BENSON, JOHN F., LOTZ, MARK A., JANSEN, DEBORAH·2008·The Journal of Wildlife Management

Abstract

Information regarding habitat types selected by federally endangered Florida panthers ( Puma concolor coryi ) at natal den sites is needed because habitats used for parturition and kitten rearing potentially influence fitness of individuals and viability of the population. We located 51 natal den sites of 30 female panthers and performed a Euclidean distance analysis to determine which habitat types were selected and avoided at dens in south Florida, USA. Panther dens were closer to upland hardwoods, pinelands, and mixed wet forests ( P ≤ 0.003) and farther from freshwater marsh‐wet prairie ( P = 0.009). We recommend that habitat protection efforts prioritize blocks of land that have abundant patches of upland hardwood, pinelands, and mixed wet forests to maintain preferred panther denning habitat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2193/2007-264

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benson et al. suggested that hydrology and resulting understory conditions in upland habitat types at least partially explain why pinelands and upland hardwoods were strongly selected by females as den sites.

    “Benson et al. [41] suggested that hydrology and resulting understory conditions in upland habitat types at least partially explain why pinelands and upland hardwoods were strongly selected by females as den sites.”

    From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [41]

  • Benson et al. found that panthers tended to select upland hardwoods, pinelands, and mixed wet forests for den sites.

    “Benson et al. [41] found that panthers tended to select upland hardwoods, pinelands, and mixed wet forests for den sites.”

    From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [41]

  • A consistent characteristic of panther den sites was extremely dense understory of saw palmetto, thickets, shrubs, or vines.

    “A consistent characteristic of panther den sites was extremely dense understory of saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), thickets, shrubs, or vines [17, 41].”

    From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [41]

  • Benson et al. suggested that the use of upland forests for denning may be a behavioral mechanism to maximize offspring survival in the flood-prone landscape of south Florida.

    “They suggested that the use of upland forests for denning may be a behavioral mechanism to maximize offspring survival in the flood-prone landscape of south Florida.”

    From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [41]

  • Panthers also selected mixed wet forests as den sites, did not avoid cypress swamps, and even denned in freshwater marsh.

    “However, panthers also selected mixed wet forests as den sites, did not avoid cypress swamps, and even denned in freshwater marsh [41].”

    From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [41]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BENSON, J. F., LOTZ, M. A., & JANSEN, D.
Affiliations
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (US)
Corresponding author
BENSON, JOHN F.
Venue
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
405-410
ISSN
  • 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-2817
OpenAlex
W2112756917
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Keywords
Florida panther, Puma concolor coryi, habitat selection, threatened species, upland hardwoods, Pinelands, habitat conservation, South Florida

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review