Inferences About Ungulate Population Dynamics Derived From Age Ratios
Abstract
Abstract: Age ratios (e.g., calf:cow for elk and fawn:doe for deer) are used regularly to monitor ungulate populations. However, it remains unclear what inferences are appropriate from this index because multiple vital rate changes can influence the observed ratio. We used modeling based on elk ( Cervus elaphus ) life‐history to evaluate both how age ratios are influenced by stage‐specific fecundity and survival and how well age ratios track population dynamics. Although all vital rates have the potential to influence calf:adult female ratios (i.e., calf:cow ratios), calf survival explained the vast majority of variation in calf:adult female ratios due to its temporal variation compared to other vital rates. Calf:adult female ratios were positively correlated with population growth rate (Λ) and often successfully indicated population trajectories. However, calf:adult female ratios performed poorly at detecting imposed declines in calf survival, suggesting that only the most severe declines would be rapidly detected. Our analyses clarify that managers can use accurate, unbiased age ratios to monitor arguably the most important components contributing to sustainable ungulate populations, survival rate of young and Λ. However, age ratios are not useful for detecting gradual declines in survival of young or making inferences about fecundity or adult survival in ungulate populations. Therefore, age ratios coupled with independent estimates of population growth or population size are necessary to monitor ungulate population demography and dynamics closely through time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent modeling study indicated that changes in elk calf survival explained 93% of variation in calf:cow ratios in a GYE elk population.
“a recent modeling study based on the life history of a GYE elk population indicated that changes in elk calf survival explained 93% of the variation in calf : cow ratios (Harris et al. 2008).”
From Animal migration amid shifting patterns of phenology and predation: lessons from a Yellowstone elk herd (2013) · cites this paper as Harris et al. 2008
Cites
Singer, F. J., Harting, A., Symonds, K. K., & Coughenour, M. B. (1997) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802410 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Northern Yellowstone elk after wolf restoration
White, P. J., & Garrott, R. A. (2005) · Wildlife Society Bulletin · doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[942:nyeawr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Middleton, A. D., Kauffman, M. J., McWhirter, D. E., Cook, J. G., Cook, R. C., Nelson, A. A., Jimenez, M. D., & Klaver, R. W. (2013) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/11-2298.1 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Self-citationChristianson, D., & Creel, S. (2014) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102330 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“Our approach avoids this problem by measuring the effect of elk abundance on the juvenile:female ratio, which has previously been shown to be strongly correlated with population growth [11,14], a correlation that we confirmed for these data (see Results).”
BackgroundResult
- Authors
- HARRIS, N. C., KAUFFMAN, M. J., & MILLS, L. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Montana (US)
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Corresponding author
- HARRIS, NYEEMA C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1143-1151
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- 1937-2817
- OpenAlex
- W2071034170
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- age ratio, ungulate population dynamics, elk, red deer, calf survival, adult survival, population growth rate, population monitoring, vital rates
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review