The DOI matches its DataCite record, with a small difference in title or year.
Comparison of international policies on electromagnetic fields
Open accessAbstract
Comparison of internationalpolicies on electromagnetic fields (power frequency and radiofrequency fields) This document is an update of an earlier overview from May 2011 (RIVM 118/2011).It was prepared as part of a research project commissioned by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management and the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment of the Netherlands.The information that forms the basis for this summary was obtained from searches of governmental and scientific websites, scientific publications, policy summaries by other organisations and personal contacts with experts in the countries in question.The information was last updated in the period from January to July 2017 1 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the FCC has earmarked the 401–406 MHz bands for Medical Device Radio Communication Service (MDRC), with varying channel bandwidths between 100 and 300 kHz (Hardell and Sage, 2008; Stam, 2018; Soliman et al., 2021).”
From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Stam, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Karipidis, K., Mate, R., Urban, D., Tinker, R., & Wood, A. (2021) · Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology · doi:10.1038/s41370-021-00297-6 · Cited by 170
Health Risks Associated With 5G Exposure: A View From the Communications Engineering Perspective
Chiaraviglio, L., Elzanaty, A., & Alouini, M. (2021) · IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2021.3106052 · Cited by 129
Calcabrini, C., Mancini, U., Bellis, R. D., Diaz, A. R., Martinelli, M., Cucchiarini, L., Sestili, P., Stocchi, V., & Potenza, L. (2016) · Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/bab.1495 · Cited by 52
Circadian gene expression and extremely low‐frequency magnetic fields: An in vitro study
Manzella, N., Bracci, M., Ciarapica, V., Staffolani, S., Strafella, E., Rapisarda, V., Valentino, M., Amati, M., Copertaro, A., & Santarelli, L. (2015) · Bioelectromagnetics · doi:10.1002/bem.21915 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Stam, R.
- Corresponding author
- Stam, R.
- ORCID
- Stam, R.
- Venue
- RIVM
- Publisher
- RIVM
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W3138795609
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
- Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
- Keywords
- electromagnetic fields, radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, international policy, electromagnetic field exposure limits, health effects of electromagnetic fields
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of international policies on electromagnetic fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21945/rivm-document-electromagnetic-fields
- The paper
- Stam, R. (2018). Comparison of international policies on electromagnetic fields. RIVM. https://doi.org/10.21945/rivm-document-electromagnetic-fields
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
