Cited by 116Social Media in Health EducationDigital Marketing and Social MediaMedia and Digital Communication

Connecting With Your Dentist on Facebook: Patients’ and Dentists’ Attitudes Towards Social Media Usage in Dentistry

Open access
Parmar, Nilesh, Dong, Lin, Eisingerich, Andreas Benedikt·2018·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social media has begun to proliferate across medical areas and transformed how medical professionals serve and interact with their patients. It offers a new communication avenue that has the potential to engage patients and, hence, may be used to create value for both medical professionals and patients. In dentistry, even though patients and dentists frequently use social media in their personal lives, little is known about their attitudes and expectations toward using social media for professional interactions. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we focus on the role of social media in dentistry. Specifically, we explore patients' and dentists' attitudes toward social media usage and their current online behaviors in this context. Furthermore, we examine potential challenges and opportunities regarding dentists' adoption of social media practices. METHODS: This research employed a large-scale online survey of 588 patients and 532 dental professionals. We assessed the attitudes, expectations, and social media behaviors from both patients' and dentists' perspectives. RESULTS: We found that more than 55% (290/532) of dentists in our sample have accounts for their dental practice on various social media platforms. Interestingly, while 73% (374/511) of patients did not expect their dental practice to have a social media presence, and 44% (207/468) thought that establishing a friendship with their dentists is not appropriate, the findings show that 36% (164/460) of patients had searched for their dentists, and 44% (207/470) of them were happy to establish contacts with dentists on social media. Furthermore, the findings highlight that patients were interested in exploring additional information such as online reviews and the qualifications of their dentists on Facebook pages. For dentists, more than half (375/432, 83%) of them in our sample thought that social media marketing is more efficient compared to traditional marketing. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed some key challenges and opportunities to utilize social media in dentistry. For both patients and dentists, the role of social media in dental services remains vague, and both parties still share concerns about connecting with each other on social media platforms. However, there also exists a sizeable number of patients who are already comfortable to connect with their dentists on social media sites such as Facebook. The current findings show that there is an opportunity for dental practices to trade upon a more active social media presence for enhanced patient interaction and engagement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/10109

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 116

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [31]Eisingerich AB Kretschmer T In e-commerce, more is more Harvard Business Review 2008 03 20 21
  2. [40]Merlo O Eisingerich AB Auh S Why customer participation matters MIT Sloan Management Review 2014 55 2 81 88
  3. [41]Eisingerich AB Bhardwaj G Miyamoto Y Behold the extreme consumers and learn to embrace them Harvard Business Review 2010 30 31
  4. [52]Seifert M Siemsen E Hadida AL Eisingerich AB When to forget the rearview mirror Harvard Business Review 2015 30
  5. [53]Eisingerich AB Bhardwaj G Does corporate social responsibility help protect a company's reputation? MIT Sloan Management Review 2011 52 3 18
  6. [55]Park CW Eisingerich AB Pol G The power of a good logo MIT Sloan Management Review; 55(2) 2014 55 2 10 12

Authors
Parmar, N., Dong, L., & Eisingerich, A. B.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Dong, Lin
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2018-06-29
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
e10109
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2809145472
Cited by
116
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8
FWCI
9.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M500562/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
dentist-patient communication, Facebook, dental marketing, patient attitudes, dentist attitudes, online reviews, patient engagement
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Dentistry, Dentists, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review