Cited by 60Total Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Digital Versus Conventional Rehabilitation after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Single-Center, Parallel-Group Pilot Study

Open access
Dias Correia, Fernando, Nogueira, André, Magalhães, Ivo, Guimarães, Joana, Moreira, Maria, Barradas, Isabel, Molinos, Maria, Teixeira, Laetitia +4 more·2019·JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is rising. In the face of rapidly increasing health care costs, ensuring widespread, cost-effective rehabilitation is a priority. Technologies allowing independent home-based rehabilitation may be the key to facilitate access, improve effectiveness, and lower costs of care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a novel artificial intelligence-powered digital biofeedback system following THA and compare the clinical outcomes against supervised conventional rehabilitation. METHODS: This was a single-center, parallel-group pilot study, with an 8-week intervention program. Patients were assessed at baseline, during the program (at 4 and 8 weeks), and 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the Timed Up and Go (TUG) score and secondary outcomes were the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (HOOS; a patient-reported outcome) and hip range of motion (ROM). RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were included: 35 digital physiotherapy (PT) versus 31 conventional. There were no differences at baseline between groups except for lower HOOS quality of life (QoL) subscale scores in the digital PT group. Clinically relevant improvements were noted in both groups at all time points. The digital PT group showed a retention rate of 86% (30/35). Per-protocol analysis revealed a superiority of the digital PT group for all outcome measures. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed the superiority of the digital PT group at all time points for TUG (change between baseline and 4 and 8 weeks: P<.001; change between baseline and 3 and 6 months: P=.001 and P=.005, respectively), with a difference between median changes of -4.79 seconds (95% CI -7.24 to -1.71) at 6 months post-THA. Between baseline and month 6, results were also superior in the digital PT group for the HOOS sports and QoL subscales and all ROM except for standing flexion. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates this novel solution holds promise in rehabilitation after THA, ensuring better clinical outcomes than conventional rehabilitation while reducing dependence on human resources. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03045549; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03045549.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/14523

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors have previously demonstrated the utility of a completely remote digital care program integrating exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy in several MSK conditions, including for upper limb.

    “Previously, we have demonstrated the utility of a completely remote digital care program (DCP) integrating exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in several MSK conditions [42,43,44,45], including for upper limb [46,47,48].”

    From Digital Rehabilitation for Elbow Pain Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study (2022) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results (Outcomes Assessment; page not provided) report benefits of digital physiotherapy after total hip arthroplasty, supporting this paper as one example of an MSK rehabilitation program. But Methods (Intervention; page not provided) describes in-person visits, so the program was not completely remote; the described intervention includes exercise guidance but does not establish an education-and-CBT component. The separate upper-limb claim is attached to citations [46–48], not this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Telerehabilitation provides comparable results to outpatient physical therapy and face-to-face home rehabilitation, while reducing costs.

    “Telerehabilitation has shown to provide comparable results to outpatient physical therapy [35–39] and to face-to-face home rehabilitation [40, 41], while reducing costs [42–44].”
  • This DCP was previously validated for feasibility and effectiveness in post-surgery MSK rehabilitation.

    “This DCP was previously validated (feasibility and effectiveness) in post-surgery MSK rehabilitation [38, 41, 45, 46].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 60

Authors
Dias Correia, F., Nogueira, A., Magalhães, I., Guimarães, J., Moreira, M., Barradas, I., Molinos, M., Teixeira, L., Pires, J., Seabra, R., Lains, J., & Bento, V.
Affiliations
  • Sword Health, SA (Portugal) (PT)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Hospital da Prelada (PT)
  • Instituto Superior da Maia (PT)
Venue
JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Published
2019-06-21
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
e14523
ISSN
2369-2529 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947984306
Cited by
60
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
total hip arthroplasty, digital rehabilitation, home-based physiotherapy, artificial intelligence, biofeedback, conventional rehabilitation, Timed Up and Go test, HOOS, hip range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, feasibility, cost-effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review