Cited by 14Mental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Response Time as an Implicit Self-Schema Indicator for Depression among Undergraduate Students: Preliminary Findings From a Mobile App-Based Depression Assessment

Open access
Chung, Kyungmi, Park, Jin Young, Joung, DaYoung, Jhung, Kyungun·2019·JMIR mhealth and uhealth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Response times to depressive symptom items in a mobile-based depression screening instrument has potential as an implicit self-schema indicator for depression but has yet to be determined; the instrument was designed to readily record depressive symptoms experienced on a daily basis. In this study, the well-validated Korean version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised (K-CESD-R) was adopted. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between depression severity (ie, explicit measure: total K-CESD-R Mobile scores) and the latent trait of interest in schematic self-referent processing of depressive symptom items (ie, implicit measure: response times to items in the K-CESD-R Mobile scale). The purpose was to investigate this relationship among undergraduate students who had never been diagnosed with, but were at risk for, major depressive disorder (MDD) or comorbid MDD with other neurological or psychiatric disorders. METHODS: A total of 70 participants-36 males (51%) and 34 females (49%)-aged 19-29 years (mean 22.66, SD 2.11), were asked to complete both mobile and standard K-CESD-R assessments via their own mobile phones. The mobile K-CESD-R sessions (binary scale: yes or no) were administered on a daily basis for 2 weeks. The standard K-CESD-R assessment (5-point scale) was administered on the final day of the 2-week study period; the assessment was delivered via text message, including a link to the survey, directly to participants' mobile phones. RESULTS: =.29. It was further revealed that the K-CESD-R Mobile app had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=.94); at least moderate concurrent validity with other depression scales, such as the Korean version of the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (ρ=.38, P=.002) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (ρ=.48, P<.001); a high adherence rate for all participants (65/70, 93%); and a high follow-up rate for 10 participants whose mobile or standard K-CESD-R score was 13 or greater (8/10, 80%). CONCLUSIONS: As hypothesized, based on a self-schema model for depression that represented both item and person characteristics, the inverted U-shaped relationship between the explicit and implicit self-schema measures for depression showed the potential of an organizational breakdown; this also showed the potential for a subsequent return to efficient processing of schema-consistent information along a continuum, ranging from nondepression through mild depression to severe depression. Further, it is expected that the updated K-CESD-R Mobile app can play an important role in encouraging people at risk for depression to seek professional follow-up for mental health care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/14657

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies found no effective results on depression but indications of substantial potential developments in the future.

    “Two studies found no effective results but indications of substantial potential developments in the future [16,24].”

    From Analysis of Mobile App-Based Mental Health Solutions for College Students: A Rapid Review (2023) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Results section reports a significant relationship between depression scores and response times, so this paper does not support the claim that it found no effective results. The Discussion (Principal Findings and Limitations; pages unavailable) calls for further app development and testing, which supports the future-development portion of the claim. This paper assessed depression screening rather than testing whether a treatment reduced depression. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 14

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]Eaton WW Smith C Ybarra M Muntaner C Tien A Maruish ME Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R) The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment: Instruments for Adults. Volume 3. 3rd edition 2004 Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 363 377
  2. [20]Beck AT Rush AJ Shaw BF Emery G Cognitive Therapy of Depression 1979 New York, NY The Guilford Press

Authors
Chung, K., Park, J. Y., Joung, D., & Jhung, K.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Jhung, Kyungun
Venue
JMIR mhealth and uhealth
Published
2019-09-13
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
e14657
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2955311392
Cited by
14
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Korea Health Industry Development Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
depression, reaction time (psychology), mobile health, depression screening, undergraduate students, major depressive disorder, scale validity, adherence, follow-up, self-report questionnaire, explicit measures, inverted U-shaped relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reaction Time, Students, Universities, Weights and Measures, Self Report, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review