Cited by 38Digital Mental Health InterventionsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersImpact of Technology on Adolescents

An internet-based self-help intervention for skin picking (SaveMySkin): pilot randomized controlled trial

Open access
Gallinat, Christina, Moessner, Markus, Haenssle, Holger A, Winkler, Julia K, Backenstrass, Matthias, Bauer, Stephanie·2019·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In spite of the psychosocial burden and medical risks associated with skin picking disorder, the health care system does not provide sufficient treatment for affected individuals to date. Therefore, an internet-based self-help program for skin picking was developed to offer easily accessible support for this population. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study evaluated the internet-based self-help program SaveMySkin. The 12-week program is based on cognitive-behavioral therapy and contains comprehensive information and exercises, a daily supportive monitoring system, and dermatological and psychological counseling via internet chat. Primary objectives were the investigation of attitudes and expectations toward the program, intervention effects on skin picking severity, user satisfaction, adherence, and willingness to participate. Secondary outcomes included the feasibility of study procedures, adequacy of assessment instruments, effects on skin picking-related impairment, dimensions of skin picking, and general psychological impairment. METHODS: A two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in a sample of 133 participants (female: 124/133, 93.2%; mean age 26.67 [SD 6.42]) recruited via the internet. Inclusion required a minimum age of 17 years and at least mild skin picking severity. Participants were randomly allocated to the intervention (64/133, 48.1%) or waitlist control group (69/133, 51.9%). All assessments were conducted online and based on self-report. RESULTS: The willingness to participate was very high in the study, so the initially planned sample size of 100 was exceeded after only 18 days. Participant expectations indicate that they believed the program to be beneficial for them (131/133, 98.5%) and provide a feeling of support (119/133, 89.5%). Reasons for study participation were insufficient outpatient health care (83/133, 62.4%) and flexibility regarding time (106/133, 79.7%) and location (109/133, 82.0%). The post-assessment was completed by 65.4% (87/133) of the sample. The majority of the intervention group who completed the entire post-assessment were satisfied with SaveMySkin (28/38, 74%) and agreed that the program is an appropriate support service (35/38, 92%). On average, participants viewed 29.31 (SD 42.02) pages in the program, and 47% (30/64) of the intervention group used the monitoring at least once a week. In comparison with the control group, the intervention group displayed substantial improvements in the skin picking severity total score (Cohen d=0.67) and especially on the subscale Symptom Severity (Cohen d=0.79). No effects on secondary outcomes were found. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the need for easily accessible interventions for skin picking disorder and the high interest in internet-based self-help within the target population. It provides important insights into the attitudes toward online support and actual user experiences. Participant feedback will be used to further enhance the intervention. Our results point to the preliminary efficacy of SaveMySkin and may lay the foundation for future research into the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the program in a multicenter clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00015236; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do? navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00015236. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1016/j.conctc.2018.100315.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/15011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BT for TTM and SPD can be efficacious when delivered online instead of face-to-face.

    “There is some research indicating that BT for TTM and SPD can be efficacious also when delivered online instead of face-to-face”

    From Internet-delivered acceptance-based behavior therapy for trichotillomania and skin-picking disorder in a psychiatric setting: A feasibility trial (2022) · cites this paper as Gallinat et al., 2019

    The Methods (Study Arms) describe SaveMySkin as an online intervention using CBT techniques, and the Discussion (Principal Findings) reports greater reductions in skin-picking severity than in the waitlist control group. This supports preliminary efficacy for online treatment of SPD. The paper does not establish efficacy of online behavioral therapy for TTM; its Introduction discusses behavioral treatment for TTM without establishing online delivery. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies of online BT for TTM/SPD have mainly used self-recruited samples in a university context.

    “previous studies have mainly used self-recruited samples in a university context”

    From Internet-delivered acceptance-based behavior therapy for trichotillomania and skin-picking disorder in a psychiatric setting: A feasibility trial (2022) · cites this paper as Gallinat et al., 2019

    The Methods (Participant Selection; page not provided) describe recruitment through online advertisements, including university mailing lists, with interested individuals registering themselves. Table 1 (Results, Baseline Characteristics; page not provided) shows that a majority of this study’s participants were university students. The paper therefore provides an example, but it does not establish that previous online BT studies of TTM/SPD mainly recruited this way. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Gallinat et al. (2019), an online intervention consisting of BT-related techniques produced larger reductions in skin-picking symptoms than a waiting-list, with a high attrition rate (35%).

    “Results indicated larger reductions in the intervention group (d = 0.67) but this study also acknowledged a high attrition rate (35 %).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 38

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th Edition 2013 Washington American Psychiatric Publishing

Authors
Gallinat, C., Moessner, M., Haenssle, H. A., Winkler, J. K., Backenstrass, M., & Bauer, S.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Gallinat, Christina
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2019-09-20
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
e15011
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963466565
Cited by
38
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
skin picking disorder, internet-based self-help intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, medication adherence, user satisfaction, feasibility, willingness to participate, psychological impairment, waitlist control, gender differences, access to mental health care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psychotherapy, Self-Help Groups, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review