The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Social Media Use Among Young Adults With Connective Tissue Disorders: Cross-Sectional Pilot Study
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Young people with genetic conditions often face challenges coping with their health condition. It can be difficult for them to meet someone with a similar condition, which is important for reinforcement of chronic illness management recommendations. Social media is used by 97% of young people in the United States and may provide those with these disorders a space for emotional expression and support. However, there is a scarcity of literature related to the use of social media among adolescents with genetic conditions as an indicator of their perception regarding their own condition. Objective: The purpose of this pilot study was to obtain preliminary data to assess and understand social media use by young people with connective tissue disorders and determine whether they use social media to connect with patients with similar conditions or whether they would be interested in doing so. Methods: We undertook a pilot study of selected connective tissue disorders occurring in young people between the ages of 11 and 25 years, including Marfan syndrome; Ehlers-Danlos syndrome subtypes classical, classical-like, cardiac-valvular, and vascular; Beals congenital contractual arachnodactyly; and Alport hereditary nephritis. The study took place within one pediatric clinical system. Patients were identified through electronic medical record search and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, coding at a Midwest university–based clinical system. Study subjects completed a short survey describing their experiences with their connective tissue disorders, their means of self-expression, their existing network of persons to communicate with, and their use of social media. Data analysis included nominal and bivariate regressions to compare social media use in relation to age. Results: Our 31 participants (42% response rate) were 55% female (17/31) and their average age was 18 years (SD 5). All participants used social media and there were no statistically significant differences between social media use and age. The majority of participants (25/30, 83%) reported that they never used social media to discuss their condition (P=.09), and only 17% (5/30) knew someone online with a similar condition (P=.50). Most participants (19/30, 63%) said they would communicate with someone with a similar disorder (P=.64). Conclusions: We found that young individuals with connective tissue disorders use at least one type of social media. A majority did not use social media to discuss their condition or know someone online with a similar condition. However, many persons were interested in finding others similarly affected. Social media could serve as a platform for young people with connective tissue disorders to connect. Peer support is important in disease management and adolescent development. Future studies should aim at understanding social media use among young people with connective tissue disorders and helping them connect with other people who have similar conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Young adult patients who used social media did so to connect with others with similar health issues and gain information on symptoms and treatments, especially in emergencies when in-person resources were unavailable.
“Those who did use social media did so with similar intentions to older adult patients: to connect with and talk to others with similar health issues and to gain information on symptoms and treatments, especially in emergencies when in-person resources were unavailable [36,37].”
From Social Media Use Among Parents and Caregivers of Children With Rare Genetic Diseases: Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
The Results (Survey; page unavailable) report that some middle-to-late adolescents and young adults used social media to discuss their condition and communicate with someone with a similar condition. The paper does not establish that these patients sought information specifically about symptoms and treatments, or that they used social media during emergencies when in-person resources were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredYoung adult patients had significant concerns regarding online privacy and misinformation.
“Young adult patients had significant concerns regarding online privacy and misinformation [36,37].”
From Social Media Use Among Parents and Caregivers of Children With Rare Genetic Diseases: Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
The Discussion (Principal Findings; page not provided) reports that most participants did not post about their condition online and discusses privacy and control over health information. It does not establish that these patients had significant privacy concerns, and no passage found addresses concerns about misinformation. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPrivacy concerns and distrust of information online were significant concerns raised by patients regarding social media use for health information.
“Privacy concerns and distrust of information online were significant concerns raised by patients regarding social media use for health information [34,36,37].”
From Social Media Use Among Parents and Caregivers of Children With Rare Genetic Diseases: Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
The Introduction and Discussion > Principal Findings (pages unavailable) describe concerns about publicly sharing health information and the importance of privacy to young people with chronic illnesses. They do not report that this study’s patients raised distrust of online information as a significant concern; Discussion > Future Studies says participants were not directly surveyed about why they might avoid communicating online about their diagnosis. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTwo excluded studies looked at adolescent and young adult patients with rare and chronic diseases.
“Two further studies [36,37], which were excluded from the review due to their focus on patients rather than parents, looked at adolescent and young adult patients with rare and chronic diseases.”
From Social Media Use Among Parents and Caregivers of Children With Rare Genetic Diseases: Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
Only a minority of young adult patients discussed their health information on social media.
“They found that only a minority of young adult patients discussed their health information on social media.”
From Social Media Use Among Parents and Caregivers of Children With Rare Genetic Diseases: Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 11
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- DietzHMarfan syndromeGeneReviews200104182020-10-23Seattle, WAUniversity of Washingtonhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1335/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK1335.pdf
- MalfaitFWenstrupRDe PaepeAClassic Ehlers-Danlos syndromeGeneReviews200705292020-10-23Seattle, WAUniversity of Washingtonhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1244/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK1244.pdf
- ByersPHVascular Ehlers-Danlos syndromeGeneReviews199909022020-10-23Seattle, WAUniversity of Washingtonhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1494/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK1494.pdf
- LevyHPHypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndromeGeneReviews200410222020-10-23Seattle, WAUniversity of Washingtonhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1279/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK1279.pdf
- CallewaertBCongenital contractural arachnodactylyGeneReviews200101232020-10-23Seattle, WAUniversity of Washingtonhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1386/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK1386.pdf
- KasthanCEAlport syndromeGeneReviews200108282020-10-23Seattle, WAUniversity of Washingtonhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1207/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK1207.pdf
- 10.1177/1359105316669877 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.061 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00431-019-03469-7 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12955-016-0488-5 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.7303 · DOI
- Ventola, CL, 2014, P T, 39, 491
- 10.2196/jmir.3692 · DOI
- 10.1080/10410236.2011.629408 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.5832 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.3494 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.015 · DOI
- 10.1177/1742395316655855 · DOI
- 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000949 · DOI
- 10.5210/fm.v19i1.4048 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajmg.a.37255 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2017-2151 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.12.025 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137 · DOI · Paper page
- Mead, S, 2006, Int J Psychosoc Rehabil, 10, 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelleher, E. F., Giampietro, P. F., & Moreno, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kelleher, Erin F
- Venue
- JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2020-10-30
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e16367
- ISSN
- 2561-6722 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7665944
- OpenAlex
- W3043263156
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- University of Wisconsin-Madison
- Marfan Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- social media use, connective tissue diseases, young adults, adolescents, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, online patient communities, peer support, chronic disease management, social networks, genetic disorders, age differences in social media use, pediatric patients
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review